User:Robert McClenon/Three Issues

Here are three issues that are involved in the question about Theresa Greenfield:


 * Should candidates for politically notable offices be considered to meet general notability on the basis of significant coverage of the campaign, if the candidate was not previously considered notable? It has in general been the practice of Wikipedia that candidates are not considered to satisfy general notability on the basis of election coverage, and therefore do not qualify for articles before the election if they did not have them before the campaign.  This question arises frequently, and it would be a good idea either to address it on a general basis or to decide that it is always addressed on a case-by-case basis.


 * When should a single AFC reviewer be allowed to accept a draft if the same title was previously deleted by AFD? When should Deletion Review be required?  The instructions for DRV say that DRV can review deletions when the circumstances have changed, such as new sources or new activities.  However, the DRV regulars normally tell applicants not to go to DRV but simply to submit the new draft for review.


 * When should a single AFC reviewer be allowed to request that a title be unsalted if the same title was previously create-protected? This question is related to the above, but is not the same.