User:Robertgabos/sandbox

Table style, colour, and content
section moved from main page


 * I suggest creating a template html table. We already do something similiar for battles - see Battle of Cisterna. I think at the very least, it should list the official name, stock symbol, yearly revinues, # of employees, owners (or major shareholders). ?Raul654 06:53, Feb 1, 2004 (UTC)

By the way, I do not intend this to be US-centric. I would be interested in how other standards, for instance, relate to the SIC identification scheme. RayKiddy 08:17, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)

If you guys are interested in standarizing company articles, you could make a Wikiproject of it. Wikiproject Companies. Poor Yorick


 * I think that I am. I probably have to create a link in the WikiProjects page to do this. I wanted to see what kind of discussion occurred. RayKiddy 03:47, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I'm not sure exactly whay you have in mind, but here is a chart you can play around with. mydogategodshat 08:57, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)

See also List of companies more stuff in this line'

<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>


 * Here's one that uses the new (prefered) wikipedia style of tables. It's a lot easier to edit, and a lot less obtrustive. &rarr;Raul654 13:05, Feb 1, 2004 (UTC)

<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR> The first one matches the style used in the scientific pages. We may or may not want to be consistent with them. I have not researched it in detail but I think animals are using red (see platypus or grouse), chemicals are using yellow (see calcium carbonate), and plants are using green (see ginkgo). Rocks and minerals are using all different styles and colours. mydogategodshat 19:30, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Plants are already using the same light green as the above templates. I recommend switching, though the amount of duplication found at Taxobox is rather depressing, so maybe it doesn't matter after all. Tuf-Kat 08:19, Feb 5, 2004 (UTC)