User:RobmDav/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
English Studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose English Studies for my article. I chose this one because it is what I am going to school for. My initial impression beforehand is that there is no lock, no star, and says that the article is missing sources or citations.

Evaluate the article
The article's intro has an ok lead section. There is a discussion on differences, although there are not that many, there are different areas/uses of English that are used. When it comes to the content of the article there needs to be more. Looking through it all, some of the sections should be fleshed out more, and it is hard to figure out if it is neutral or not. It seems like there are undertones of a bias. When it comes to the organization and sources, the organization could be a bit better, but this could just be because the article needs fleshed out more as well. There are sections that don't appear to fit just because there is not enough there. The writing is easy to read and appears to be grammatically correct. There are not any uses of images/pictures, or media, but to be fair I am not sure how easy it would be to accomplish that with this article. The talk page for it is, well it is something. there seems to be mention of the biases in the article when it comes to career fields, viability, etc. There is a little bit that has been said about errors and useful information.

My overall impression seems to be that a lot of people involved in this article may not have gotten along and it is shown over the duration of the talk page. There is some useful information but I honestly expected more out of this since it was in the academic realm.