User:Robo Cop/Sandbox

Full review
Here we go...
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

5b - Appropriate use of images with suitable captions.

 * One or two more appropriately tagged images are necessary to help illustrate the article.


 * Comments
 * All in all, this article is very well done and is very much deserving of a Good Article status.
 * One image or two more of the team in action to help illustrate the article would do the trick.
 * '''I will give a deadline of August 1st at 12:00 noon UTC for the needed work to be completed. If the work is completed by then, I will list this as a pass, if not, it will be listed as a fail. The final say will be on the person who gives the second opinion, which will be after this criteria is either met or not. Thank you! MobileSnail 16:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)