User:Roccod/Sandbox

Experiment freely!

Intro Two thirds are used to critize parapsychology. After that it goes on with dedicating approximately half of every section to critize studies or finds, very seldom do the parapsycholist gets to respond to this critic. Sometimes, especially when the critic is very broad in nature (ex lack of theory models or critic agains the idea of "psi").

In my opinion actual information about parapsychology and its finds could be improved. Much of the lengthy critic could be moved together into a controversy/discussion section, where it also would be good to see some response to the critic. All in order to improve NPOV.

Roccod (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)