User:Rockluver/Conservation grazing/SkateNate Peer Review

General info
Allexis Cruz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rockluver/Conservation_grazing?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Conservation grazing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: Lead is similar to that of the article itself. In general, don't forget to unbold the sentences before moving it into the article. The bolded sentences could be more expanded or explained better to ensure the reader understands the topic.

Content: Good call adding information on regenerative agriculture and monitored grazing. All content fits with the article topic

Tone and Balance: The article has a very scientific tone, which could be difficult for the everyday reader to comprehend at times. The article is neutral and well balanced.

Sources: both good sources, one is a little outdated but doesn't seem to affect the credibility of the content in the article.

Organization: I like that the "effects" paragraphs were threaded together under a new header, it makes it easier to understand. All other added material is organized well.

Overall really great job! The added content does add to the article. Make sure you are looking for more sources to add in somewhere too, since the goal is a minimum of 5 added sources.