User:Rocksanddirt/sandbox/1

Good/feature article review ideas

start with waldorf education:
 * 1) It is—
 * 2) *(a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard;
 * could be better. Need to look at each paragraph.


 * 1) *(b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details;
 * Sort of. Lots that might be included doesn't appear in reliable sources.


 * 1) *(c) factually accurate: claims are verifiable against reliable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations; this involves the provision of a "References" section in which sources are listed, complemented by inline citations where appropriate;
 * yes.


 * 1) *(d) neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and
 * yes, but....see C, there are critical views not represented in reliable sources.


 * 1) *(e) stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process.
 * since clean up following arbitration.


 * 1) It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
 * 2) *(a) a lead—a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the greater detail in the subsequent sections;
 * yes. maybe to many references?


 * 1) *(b) appropriate structure—a system of hierarchical headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents (see section help); and
 * need to review this.


 * 1) *(c) consistent citations—where required by Criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1) (see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes or endnotes, the meta:cite format is recommended).
 * need to review formats, but I think they are ok.


 * 1) Images. It has images and other media where they are appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
 * yes.


 * 1) Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
 * maybe. kinda long, with kindof a lot of references, and links to subarticles.