User:RockySurfaces/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Ring of Fire (Northern Ontario)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This is a more recent (within the last 10-20 years) mineral discovery that would be crucial for future EV industries and other sectors that require such minerals. This matters for the production of electric vehicles that require resources that could be found at this location, and help local economies grow through extraction and refining the resources.

It seems as though it will be a large undertaking for all companies involved to develop the necessary infrastructure to begin mining and later processing and selling of the minerals and ores. Also included is the monumental task of cooperating and agreeing with local settlements about their share and responsibilities of large companies entering the area.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Most if not all of the provided info seems to be relevant to the scope of the project of developing mining related infrastructure in the remote area, and all levels of government and private companies involved.

Upon first glance there does not appear to be any outdated information presented, nor does there appear to be misrepresentation, or missing details.

Though the article attempts to remain unbiased, there may be some bias slipping through about who is quoted within the article further on.

Many viewpoints are presented that cover previous leadership and working with local residents about the proposed projects.

Links to sources do work, taking the user to the source in the reference section, where most seem to be both appropriate and reliable, though some are from local news articles. There is clear diversity of authors to the referenced information.

Talks discuss missing infograms about geology of the proposed area of the Ring of Fire, and one about potential confusion to the Pacific volcanic Ring of Fire. There are only a handful of talks on this topic.