User:Roger Davies/Plagiarism evaluation

This report covers contributions to 411 articles from timestamp 2005-09-17 07:14:29 UTC to timestamp 2010-02-21 06:21:13 UTC.

Articles 1 through 20

 * Reception history of Jane Austen:, at least, I think no. He seems to have been repairing a copy & paste move. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * British Battalion: . This was an attributed split. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Romeo and Juliet: Non-creative content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Military: I didn't find anything. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Literary influence of Hamlet: Split; added copied to talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * International Brigades order of battle: (13 edits, 13 major, +6981) 
 * I can't review the sources. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Characters in Hamlet: Split; added copied to talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Peat Bog Soldiers: Not sure about the copyright status of the lyrics, which were registered in the US. Checking. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * American Battle Monuments Commission: Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * André Marty: (11 edits, 11 major, +3551) 
 * I didn't find anything concerning from a copyright standpoint. Several of the links are dead, tho, so I could not check. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Valley of Jarama: Looking into song lyrics, though I find no sign of registration on them. There's a preview of the book, and I don't see any issues there. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Janissary: (12 edits, 12 major, +3413) 
 * Adam Albert von Neipperg: Properly attributed transwiki. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * William Lummis: (2 edits, 2 major, +3117) 
 * Milton Wolff: Able to view enough of Eby to assert pretty confidently no issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * A copy I've seen has nothing on Wolff on pages 66 or 67; the first reference is page 137, and "Largely self-educated, ... [he] was an intellectual" comes from page 318. Ironholds (talk) 11:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! But these all come from p. 319 (which I've added). There's a typo in the cited stuff too: "no cape whatsoever" should have read "no hat whatever" (!?) but it's so trivial, I've just removed it. Added a cite too for the Hemingway quote, which was missing one.  Roger Davies  talk 13:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm only checking for plagiarism/copyright concerns; I'm not fact-checking or verifying page numbers. Strangely, the book has disappeared from snippet view (only his other book, which does include some of the same material, shows here atm: ), but the snippet view check I did showed me enough to see that material around the quotes was not a copyright/plagiarism issue. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Aaaand it's back again. Magic! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Battle of Arras (1917): (40 edits, 40 major, +2738) 
 * Fred Copeman: (15 edits, 15 major, +2654) 
 * Can't review the sources. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Palafox Battalion: (5 edits, 5 major, +2545) 
 * List of German veterans of the International Brigades: Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Norman Franks: No issues here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles 21 through 40

 * Christopher Pugsley: I think structurally the opening line was a bit too close to . Revised. Otherwise, I didn't see any problems to that or the former bio at . --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Operation Castor: Mostly non-creative improvements; no problems found. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * List of New Zealand soldiers executed during World War I: (2 edits, 2 major, +2389) 
 * Can't see the book source, but nothing found elsewhere. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * For info, I've expanded this slightly, tidied it up a bit, and reffed it much more closely.  Roger Davies  talk 04:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Hamlet:
 * Can't view the sources here, but otherwise the content seems okay. I've spot-checked google & google books. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * List of books on military executions in World War I: Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * German War Graves Commission: I don't see any problems here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Brigitte Friang: (1 edits, 1 major, +2343) 
 * Can't view the sources. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Fricourt German war cemetery: I don't find any problems. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * XV International Brigade: (5 edits, 5 major, +2337) 
 * French Army Mutinies (1917): (6 edits, 6 major, +2250) 
 * Cannock Chase German war cemetery: (3 edits, 3 major, +2248) 
 * John McCrae: Nothing found. Able to do snippet view of book source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * In John McCrae "McCrae's horse, "Bonfire", led the procession, his master's riding boots reversed in the stirrups", in we find ""Bonfire led the procession, with McCrae's riding boots reversed in the stirrups." Ironholds (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I also note that this work isn't cited; surely plagiarism? Ironholds (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting example; without seeing the name "John McCrae", I knew immediately who the sentence was about, because this fact is something taught every year in Canadian schools. This is where it gets hard; you find an example on Googlebooks, but I can tell you honestly that nearly the identical wording of this sentence appears in dozens of books that talk about McCrae, including textbooks used in schools from coast to coast in Canada. That's because it is nearly impossible to reword a sentence containing simple and clear facts in a way that doesn't read like every other sentence that contains the same facts. From our policy: "Editors who claim that the phrasing at issue is plagiarism must show that there is an alternative phrasing that does not make the passage more difficult to read." What would be your suggestion here?  Risker (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * McCrae's funeral procession was led by his horse, symbolically adorned as riderless Ironholds (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I suppose the issue here is whether there's any uniqueness or originality in the expression and whether any purpose is served by writing around it. Replacing "boots reversed in the stirrups" with "symbolically adorned as riderless" seems to me, with respect, to be such a convoluted way of saying it that even someone who was familiar with the notion of "reversed boots" would be hard pressed to guess its meaning. For what it's worth, my take is that "boots reversed in the stirrups" is a collocation, a widely-used logical and natural lexical unit with a specific meaning. It generates 37,000 ghits. Related lexical phrases "flags flying at half mast" (237,000 ghits) and "flag draped coffin" gets a stonking (1,900,000 ghits).  Roger Davies  talk 05:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It was merely a suggestion, and one I'd rewrite anyway since it's rather clunky. "lots of people use it" does not make a good excuse when there are valid alternatives. Besides, "lots of people use it" is irrelevant; the source used it, and you copied it nearly verbatim. That is the problem here.Ironholds (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't copy the text nearly verbatim from a book I've never seen. The problem here is you're assuming that the text was a lift from a source you've suggested. The reality is that there are limited numbers of ways of describing the horse and the funeral, and both have been widely described. For instance, I've just looked up what the Holts say in Poets of The Great War: "The funeral procession was led by his horse, Bonfire, his master's boots reversed in the stirrups." I cannot remember at this distance in time (three years) where the information came from but it is scarcely a state secret that his horse was called Bonfire and led the procession with boots reversed. Incidentally, photos of the funeral are widely available clearly showing the reversed boots. If it helps, I also spoke to the Guelph Museum at the time to try to get a copy of the funeral photograph but they wanted too much money for it (which is odd because they donated it the following year). Frankly, if I'd seen Prescott I'd have made much more of it: for instance, mentioning the presence of Sir Arthur Currie at the funeral, as he is far more notable than McCrae's equine companion.  Roger Davies  talk 02:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And the photographs matter how? Again, you now have (and would easily have found in the past) a valid alternative should you choose to use it. Ironholds (talk) 03:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * A valid alternative to what? I've not seen Prescott and an attempt I've just made on Amazon to buy it reveals that it's rare, with copies going for £80/120$ and upwards, which is far more than I'm prepared to buy for one. The photographs matter because I have a longstanding interest in McCrae; have seen them many times over the years; and they evidence the reversed boots.  Roger Davies  talk 03:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I saw that line, and it did raise flags for me as well. Coincidental matches are entirely possible, though. When I find a single passage that seems close, I consider the degree of creativity in the content first. In my initial check, I realized that the bit about the boots reversed seems to be formulaic: see and ). (Even in a google book search, the line that raised flags for you is 10th on my hits for that phrase.) Half of the sentence is evidently common expression. That leaves the horse leading the procession. The next thing I do is check to see if there is a pattern of content taken from the suspect text or evidence that the contributor has seen the text. That one worried me at first, since Roger seemed to have been quoting from that book in other content, but I soon realized that the source had actually been introduced here and just carried forward by Roger. I checked for similarity from other new content and failed to find anything I felt sufficient to substantiate an issue here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Talking of paraphrasing, I noticed that McCrae museum site has this: "McCrae's horse, Bonfire, wore his master's boots backwards in military tradition" :)))  Roger Davies  talk 15:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL! Poor horse! That sounds dreadfully uncomfortable. :D --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * "A valid alternative to what?" - to your phrasing, maybe? my suggestion needs tweaking, but riderless horse as opposed to a phrase trotted out in sources? Ironholds (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * We discussed this sort of issue last year, when we drafted WP:Plagiarism. That is why we agreed to insert the phrase, "it should be borne in mind that an occasional sentence in an article that bears a recognizable similarity to a sentence in a cited source is not generally a cause for concern. Some facts and opinions can only be expressed in so many ways, and still be the same fact, or opinion. A plagiarism concern arises when there is evidence of systematic copying of the diction of one or more sources across multiple sentences or paragraphs." I wonder if that point should be made more prominent.
 * Google News alone, in its limited selection, shows nearly 200 news sources that have used the expression "boots reversed in the stirrups" over the past 130 years. Three books by three different authors use the expression in relation to Bonfire leading the procession at McCrae's funeral. WP:Plagiarism was never intended to stop an editor from using a widely used, idiomatic way of saying something, or from reporting precise facts as they are reported in sources. -- JN 466  11:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Polish Volunteers (SCW): I'll look at this under Polish volunteers in the Spanish Civil War, where it's gone. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Orglandes German war cemetery: I have concerns about an image, but that's naught to do with this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * List of Arras and Vimy Ridge Victoria Cross recipients: Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * List of Welsh Victoria Cross recipients of World War I: Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Polish volunteers in the Spanish Civil War: I didn't find any problems. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Naftali Botwin Company: (2 edits, 2 major, +1931) 
 * Afraid I can't even see a snippet view of the book used here. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Ivor Maxse: (1 edits, 1 major, +1926) 
 * I can only see snippet views of the book. I think the opening couple of lines would have benefited from additional sourcing to help separate it further from . It's very basic information, but structurally pretty close. Is it just me, or does this man look like he's made from wax? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed lead and added another source.  Roger Davies  talk 03:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also moved the quote from italics to within rabbit ears (and copy-edited it). Incidentally, Maxse is one of these really frustrating subjects: everyone bangs on about what a great trainer he was but no one says how he did it. (And yes he does look waxwork-ish.)  Roger Davies  talk 03:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Battles of the Isonzo: Attributed in-Wiki copy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles 41 through 60

 * XIII International Brigade: (3 edits, 3 major, +1868) 
 * Baha ad-Din ibn Shaddad: (7 edits, 7 major, +1865) 
 * Gary Sheffield (historian): (3 edits, 3 major, +1857) 
 * Kurt Julius Goldstein: (4 edits, 4 major, +1837) 
 * St Symphorien Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery: (1 edits, 1 major, +1825) 
 * Steve Nelson (activist): Oh, back to Eby. It's a snippet view only, but I do not see any copied content in the snippets I can access. Can't see this, for instance, but I can see this and a few other passages and find no visible issue. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Vladslo German war cemetery: (1 edits, 1 major, +1801) 
 * Museum of the Great War: Checking. Source viewable in archive (Subpages not, but viewable at earlier link: ) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that only some of these subpages are viewable; I didn't see any problems in what I could access, but there were limits to where I could go. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Saint-Bonnet-le-Froid: Attributed interwiki translation. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Operation Camargue: (13 edits, 13 major, +1762) 
 * Florence American Cemetery and Memorial: (2 edits, 2 major, +1750) 
 * España 1936 (film): (1 edits, 1 major, +1730) 
 * Horst Günther: Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Guernica (painting): Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Characters in Romeo and Juliet: Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Canadian Battlefield Memorials Restoration Project: (2 edits, 2 major, +1696) 
 * The Unknown Warrior: checking. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Got a run of 5 words ("forming the guard of honour"), but surrounding text is amply rewritten. Too brief a run of words to be a problem in itself from a copyvio standpoint. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't read all of this, but in the snippets I could find, I didn't find any issues - no more than a couple of words in sequence as above, with otherwise rewritten and restructured content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've tweaked this article quite a lot as the text is fairly festooned with guards of honour of one sort or another as well as various other clumsinesses and repetitions.  Roger Davies  talk 08:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll have to take your word for that. :D I wasn't reading for flow—though I often pick up some interesting information; I think it was in the Military article that I read about and was astonished by the whole concept of gay bombs. I actually had to go read the main article on that one, which is something I hardly ever do. When I scan for duplicated text, I'm usually focused. But, really, wow. In 1994, no less. Anyway, a "forming the guard of honour" or two does not a copyvio make, as such is pretty formulaic. So long as the text around it differs in language and structure, it's not a problem. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Guy Pedroncini: I don't think this is a problem. At creation, it would have benefited from another source, which would have helped to separate it from the one used. Mind you, my French is very rudimentary. But most of this is straightforward information. Probably, I would have recommended rephrasing the last sentence. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Emily Dickinson: (29 edits, 29 major, +1655) 
 * George Nathan: This one has already been discussed. I don't believe there are copyright or plagiarism issues in the article, but I can't see Monks and one passage did follow closely on Eby at one point. Content added here said, "Even though he had been turned down for Communist Party membership because of his sexual orientation, Comintern observers admired him for his "cool arrogance under fire" .” -- snippet view of source says: "His funeral drew a distinguished crowd, for he was admired by Soviet "observers" for his "cool arrogance under fire," even though he had been refused membershp in the Communist Party because of his sexual orientation. ...” (sic; 202) This is a bit close for my tastes, but it's a single borderline passage that was altered within days. If I found this passage (unaltered) in an article, I'd rewrite it with an edit summary that says, "rewriting to separate from source", which I tend to do when I think a passage falls on the safe side of the big gray area between "copyright infringing close paraphrase" and "complete rewrite" but could use a little nudge to get it out of the gray. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles 61 through 80

 * Camp Vernet: (5 edits, 5 major, +1637) 
 * Fritz von Lossberg: (9 edits, 9 major, +1636) 
 * Ay Carmela: (5 edits, 5 major, +1617) 
 * Aliens Act 1905: (4 edits, 4 major, +1617) 
 * XI International Brigade: (2 edits, 2 major, +1608) 
 * ¡Ay Carmela! (film): (3 edits, 3 major, +1599) 
 * Henri de Turenne (writer): (3 edits, 3 major, +1577) 
 * Denis Auguste Duchêne: (2 edits, 2 major, +1576) 
 * Neuville-St Vaast German war cemetery: (3 edits, 3 major, +1550) 
 * Dabrowski Battalion: (8 edits, 8 major, +1534) 
 * Dimitrov Battalion: (2 edits, 2 major, +1524) 
 * Berlin 1939-1945 Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cemetery: (1 edits, 1 major, +1517) 
 * List of Welsh Victoria Cross recipients: (1 edits, 1 major, +1517) 
 * La Treille: French Wiki translation, so noted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig: Can't see the major source, but note it is PD by age. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Viva la XV Brigada (song): No problems. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * John Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher: (19 edits, 19 major, +1433) 
 * Battle of Vimy Ridge: (7 edits, 7 major, +1420) 
 * Johannes Kunze: (5 edits, 5 major, +1391) 
 * Peter Hofschröer: (1 edits, 1 major, +1388) 

Articles 81 through 100

 * Étienne Carjat: Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Jane Austen: Just images. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Anne Curry: (2 edits, 2 major, +1368) 
 * XIV International Brigade: (1 edits, 1 major, +1348) 
 * Jarama Valley (communist song): (5 edits, 5 major, +1336) 
 * Local government in Pakistan: (1 edits, 1 major, +1319) 
 * Souvenirs d'enfance: (2 edits, 2 major, +1299) 
 * Andrew Hamilton Russell: (2 edits, 2 major, +1294) 
 * Artillery of World War I: (1 edits, 1 major, +1286) 
 * Saint Julien Memorial: (1 edits, 1 major, +1270) 
 * List of South African Victoria Cross recipients: (1 edits, 1 major, +1270) 
 * Memorial reconstruction: (1 edits, 1 major, +1267) 
 * Louis Gardel: (2 edits, 2 major, +1259) 
 * Ernest Alfred Benians: (1 edits, 1 major, +1244) 
 * HMS Donegal: (1 edits, 1 major, +1240) 
 * International Brigades data: (3 edits, 3 major, +1231) 
 * Battle of Passchendaele: (2 edits, 2 major, +1218) 
 * Non-Intervention Committee: (3 edits, 3 major, +1198) 
 * Jarosław Dąbrowski: (2 edits, 2 major, +1194) 
 * Tel Aviv: (3 edits, 3 major, +1193) 

Articles 101 through 120

 * James Lafayette: (3 edits, 3 major, +1187) 
 * HMS Valorous: (1 edits, 1 major, +1130) 
 * FlyAsianXpress: (1 edits, 1 major, +1130) 
 * Abraham Lincoln Brigade: (6 edits, 6 major, +1129) 
 * Robert Hale Merriman: (3 edits, 3 major, +1119) 
 * Brookwood Cemetery: (3 edits, 3 major, +1116) 
 * Issy Smith: (4 edits, 4 major, +1116) 
 * Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando: (1 edits, 1 major, +1115) 
 * Julian Putkowski: (1 edits, 1 major, +1103) 
 * Capital punishment by the United States military: (5 edits, 5 major, +1081) 
 * Second Vinson Act: (1 edits, 1 major, +1080) 
 * Vuilleman Battalion: (1 edits, 1 major, +1064) 
 * Sonnet 121: (2 edits, 2 major, +1057) 
 * Sandweiler German war cemetery: (2 edits, 2 major, +1053) 
 * Sonnet 117: (3 edits, 3 major, +1046) 
 * HMS Calcutta (1831): (2 edits, 2 major, +1020) 
 * Pete Seeger: (1 edits, 1 major, +923) 
 * Jewish volunteers in the Spanish Civil War: (8 edits, 8 major, +896) 
 * Notre Dame de Lorette: (2 edits, 2 major, +889) 
 * David Davies (Dai'r Cantwr): (1 edits, 1 major, +886) 

Articles 121 through 140

 * Saint-Romain-Lachalm: (4 edits, 4 major, +861) 
 * Rakosi Battalion: (2 edits, 2 major, +856) 
 * List of World War I flying aces by number of victories: (2 edits, 2 major, +846) 
 * Songs of the Spanish Civil War: (3 edits, 3 major, +823) 
 * Henri-Chapelle American Cemetery and Memorial: (3 edits, 3 major, +808) 
 * British Battalion (Malaya 1941): (1 edits, 1 major, +801) 
 * Stade des Ponts Jumeaux: (3 edits, 3 major, +801) 
 * In Flanders Fields Museum: (1 edits, 1 major, +788) 
 * Henryk Toruńczyk: (4 edits, 4 major, +785) 
 * Aisne-Marne American Cemetery and Memorial: (4 edits, 4 major, +770) 
 * Battle of Verrières Ridge: (5 edits, 5 major, +770) 
 * Flanders Fields: (1 edits, 1 major, +765) 
 * Arthur Rimbaud: (16 edits, 16 major, +755) 
 * Ellen Whitaker: (1 edits, 1 major, +752) 
 * Hoang Van Chi: (1 edits, 1 major, +748) 
 * Jason Gurney: (3 edits, 3 major, +745) 
 * Aviad Raz: (1 edits, 1 major, +743) 
 * George Hanger, 4th Baron Coleraine: (2 edits, 2 major, +741) 
 * Gerald Oram: (5 edits, 5 major, +731) 
 * Sinan: (8 edits, 8 major, +729) 

Articles 141 through 160

 * Piet Chielens: (1 edits, 1 major, +705) 
 * Chinua Achebe: (3 edits, 3 major, +698) 
 * HMS Chesapeake (1855): (2 edits, 2 major, +692) 
 * Thalmann Battalion: (1 edits, 1 major, +683) 
 * Munich Waldfriedhof: (1 edits, 1 major, +676) 
 * HMS Northampton: (1 edits, 1 major, +665) 
 * Ernst Busch (actor): (2 edits, 2 major, +659) 
 * Thälmann Battalion: (1 edits, 1 major, +656) 
 * XII International Brigade: (3 edits, 3 major, +641) 
 * Hitler Youth: (3 edits, 3 major, +627) 
 * Counteroffensive: (1 edits, 1 major, +623) 
 * Gustav Regler: (3 edits, 3 major, +622) 
 * Vladimir Ćopić: (1 edits, 1 major, +617) 
 * Mengal: (2 edits, 2 major, +616) 
 * Ysselsteyn: (2 edits, 2 major, +611) 
 * Florent Couao-Zotti: (2 edits, 2 major, +603) 
 * Briard: (1 edits, 1 major, +590) 
 * Newcastle town wall: (1 edits, 1 major, +588) 
 * Flanders fields: (1 edits, 1 major, +586) 
 * Carmen Maura: (1 edits, 1 major, +576) 

Articles 161 through 180

 * Louise Michel Battalions: (2 edits, 2 major, +575) 
 * Cassandra Austen: (1 edits, 1 major, +573) 
 * Lae War Cemetery: (3 edits, 3 major, +567) 
 * Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria: (3 edits, 3 major, +565) 
 * Jules Dumont: (1 edits, 1 major, +562) 
 * Michael Schiavo: (1 edits, 1 major, +561) 
 * Sonnet 122: (4 edits, 4 major, +559) 
 * Michael Carver, Baron Carver: (1 edits, 1 major, +557) 
 * Plan XVII: (1 edits, 1 major, +552) 
 * Alcázar of Toledo: (1 edits, 1 major, +550) 
 * Flanders Field American Cemetery and Memorial: (2 edits, 2 major, +535) 
 * Chemin des Dames: (1 edits, 1 major, +530) 
 * Patrick Balfour, 3rd Baron Kinross: (1 edits, 1 major, +525) 
 * Cara al Sol: (3 edits, 3 major, +522) 
 * Oise-Aisne American Cemetery and Memorial: (2 edits, 2 major, +509) 
 * Battle of Cambrai (1918): (2 edits, 2 major, +503) 
 * Langemarck: (1 edits, 1 major, +503) 
 * Royal Academy of Fine Arts Antwerp: (1 edits, 1 major, +503) 
 * Letters of Arthur Rimbaud: (4 edits, 4 major, +500) 
 * Alpine climate: (1 edits, 1 major, +495) 

Articles 181 through 200

 * Traffic Ramaswamy: (3 edits, 3 major, +487) 
 * Third Battle of Ypres: (1 edits, 1 major, +485) 
 * Milan Copic: (1 edits, 1 major, +484) 
 * International Brigades: (10 edits, 10 major, +482) 
 * James Graham Goodenough: (2 edits, 2 major, +478) 
 * Mark Lambert (actor): (1 edits, 1 major, +473) 
 * Viva la Quinta Brigada (song): (4 edits, 4 major, +465) 
 * Military history of France: (1 edits, 1 major, +451) 
 * La Cambe: (1 edits, 1 major, +450) 
 * Jock Cunningham: (2 edits, 2 major, +448) 
 * Fricourt: (2 edits, 2 major, +448) 
 * Cabaret (film): (1 edits, 1 major, +446) 
 * HMS Coromandel: (3 edits, 3 major, +442) 
 * Hans Beimler (Communist): (2 edits, 2 major, +442) 
 * Prince's Palace of Monaco: (2 edits, 2 major, +431) 
 * Sobrino de Botín: (1 edits, 1 major, +428) 
 * USS South Dakota (BB-57): (1 edits, 1 major, +422) 
 * La Cambe German war cemetery: (2 edits, 2 major, +420) 
 * Ay Carmela (play): (2 edits, 2 major, +418) 
 * Gabino Diego: (2 edits, 2 major, +411) 

This report generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2010-02-23T15:55:43+00:00 in 0.12 sec.