User:Roggemaj/Cocaine dependence/Parkerpons Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Roggemaj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cocaine dependence
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The overall content added to the article is of good quality and supports the article. There was strength added to the signs and symptoms of Cocaine dependence and the epidemiology. The information added her supports the article in a neutral standpoint. The context added is also up to date and stays relevant to the article and in the lead section in which it was added. Sources are also added and cited to support the added information. To better support the article more I think content could have been added to the lead section for the introduction of Cocaine dependence and information on the stimulation use disorder. The treatment section could also use some more context. Like I said, overall I think the contributions to this article were significant and supported the article.