User:Romagall/sandbox

 Article Evaluation 

Article #1: Human migration Everything seems to tie in with the topic of human migration, even though the article mostly talks about the theories of migration and why people migrate. I was expecting to see more stats and maybe the effects or the future predictions of migration. I didn't see any biased claims directly. The only parts that can need more explaining is when describing refugees/asylum seekers and who counts as a migrant versus not. Those are very set definitions that may change depending on the situation. I would say they didn't really go into detail with present situations that are happening in the world as examples. Yes the links work and do support the claims. There are a lot of citations missing, yet most of the sources used are .org websites and the world data bank. Which are just facts, even though I would say they are kind of biased especially websites that support the refugee cause. There are dates that are missing and citations, and the information is somewhat out of date since most of the graphs are around the year 2015. People are agreeing in the sense that they are saying there are a lot of errors, the scope is very broad, outdated, too historical and many other things. Yes it is part of a number of different wiki projects: WikiProject Archaeology, WikiProject Anthropology, WikiProject Human Genetic History, WikiProject History, etc. We talked about only a few of the main economic theories and this article goes into a historical analysis of the old theories, we talked about migration in the current world sense while this article was very set in the past and didn't take into account the present day events.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

 Article Edit: 

Copied from: Spanish Americans
 * Tried adding my self-made graph but it didn't let me? I do not know why? Myybe because it was a screenshot of my own graph from google sheets?
 * Graph was about: Spaniards Obtaining Lawful Permanent Resident Status By Region and Selected Country of Last Residence>>Showing The greatest immigration waves of Spaniards to the United States between the 1900s-1930s and 1960s-1980s.
 * Error message reads "We could not determine whether this file is suitable for Wikimedia Commons. Please only upload photos that you took yourself with your camera, or see what else is acceptable. See the guide to make sure the file is acceptable and learn how to upload it on Wikimedia Commons."

Immigration to the United States from Spain was controversially minimal but steady during the first half of the nineteenth century, with an increase during the 1850s and 1860s resulting from the the bloody warfare of the Carlist civil wars during the years of 1833-1876. Much larger numbers of Spanish immigrants entered the country in the first quarter of the twentieth century—27,000 in the first decade and 68,000 in the second—due to the same circumstances of rural poverty and urban congestion that led other Europeans to emigrate in that period, as well as unpopular wars. ORIGINAL: An estimated 746,000 Hispanics of Spanish origin resided in the United States in 2013. By Spaniards, we mean people who self-identify as Hispanic of Spanish origin, which can mean them their selves are Spanish immigrants or they trace their family ancestry back to Spain. Spaniards are the ninth largest population of Hispanic origin living in the United States, which makes up about 1.4% of the United States Hispanic population in 2013.
 * Added the years range/Rephrased
 * Added New Paragraph under Number of Spanish Americans:

ADDED" In 2013, an estimated 746,000 Hispanics of Spanish origin were living in the United States, making them the ninth largest Hispanic origin population residing in the United States. In this number we account for people who self-identify as Hispanic of Spanish origin, which can mean that them their selves are immigrants from Spain or have family descent from back to Spain.