User:Romarcum/Fender's blue butterfly/WildlifeMama Peer Review

General info
Romarcum
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Romarcum/Fender's blue butterfly:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Fender's blue butterfly:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the article is easy to read and neutral in tone. The sections are well organized, and are balanced in length compared to other sections. The citations are varied and relevant to the content. It's an interesting article that an average person could understand, with relevant links to more information. I did not notice any significant grammar or spelling mistakes, so good job on proofreading and properly citing sources.

The newest source is from 2021, and there could be more recent research about its current population especially since conservation efforts have been going on. WildlifeMama (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

The lead does contain some details about the butterfly's range that would be better placed in the Habitat Destruction section. The section on Mutualism is correct, but relatively short. More details would help, like explaining how the ants and butterfly interact or adding a link to the "facultative mutualism" article (or similar).