User:Ronaldwsh/Homo reciprocans/Qshablog Peer Review

Homo reciprocans

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Ronaldwsh)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Ronaldwsh/Homo reciprocans - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

== The draft has really good content about homo reciprocans and it quotes studies to justify the findings and points. The tone and balance of the draft is really aligned with the overall tone and theme of the topic. Content is very relevant to the topic, and it has no grammar mistakes. The content also helps reader enhance the understanding of the topic very well. It is really clear to understand the topic because it is broken into the sections, so it is easier to get a grasp of the topic. ==

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)