User:Ronnotel/DemoMan

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 16:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
is a disruptive influence at Indian Rebellion of 1857. Previously subject to a 3-month topic ban, he has resumed edit warring.

Cause of concern
User:DemolitionMan has been blocked repeatedly for disruptive editing at Indian Rebellion of 1857, inserting a hostile pro-Hindu POV. His contribution history demonstrates a narrow focus on this topic, almost to the point of being a single purpose account. He has engaged in persistent edit warring, been blocked for violation of WP:3RR, been confirmed by checkuser to have engaged in abusive sock-puppetry, and used a derogatory epithet in a blatant personal attack. He voluntarily agreed to a three-month topic ban on all Desi-related articles, which has since expired. Lately, he has begun edit warring again (see, and  for an example of contentious behavior over a long-settled issue, which together with these reverts , ,  regarding his insertion of a controversial source are a violation of WP:3RR. He has also demonstrated incivility in his recent remarks. See ,.

I'd like to ask the community place User:DemolitionMan under a one-revert restriction on all Desi-related articles. He seems incapable of editing constructively and moving towards consensus. He displays an open contempt for those with which he disagrees and often fails to assume good faith.

Applicable policies and guidelines
List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct.


 * Edit warring
 * Three-revert rule
 * WP:CIVIL
 * WP:SPA

Desired outcome
I seek community consensus that User:DemolitionMan be placed under a one-revert editing restriction on all Desi-related articles.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute.



---

Additional users endorsing this cause for concern.



Questions
''Any users may post questions in this section. Answers should be reserved for those certifying the dispute.''

Q.

A.

Q.

A.

Response
''{This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed. Users not named in the request or certifying the request should post under Additional views below.''}

Response to concerns
{Add summary here.}

Applicable policies and guidelines
List the policies and guidelines that apply to the response.



Questions
''Any users may post questions in this section. Answers should be reserved for the user named in the dispute.''

Q.

A.

Q.

A.

Additional views
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.

{Enter summary here.}

Users who endorse this summary:



Proposed solutions
''This section is for all users to propose solutions to resolve this dispute. This section is not a vote and resolutions are not binding except as agreed to by involved parties. ''

Template
1)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
2)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
3)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

User:DemolitionMan has been blocked repeatedly for disruptive editing at Indian Rebellion of 1857, inserting a hostile pro-Hindu POV. He has engaged in persistent edit warring, been blocked for violation of WP:3RR, found to have engaged in abusive sock-puppetry, and used derogatory epithets. He voluntarily agreed to a three-month topic ban on all Desi-related articles, which has since expired. Lately, he has begun edit warring again and technically violated WP:3RR with a series of reverts by adding controversial sources and insisting on inserting Hindi language into the article against consensus and making incivil remarks.

I'd like to ask the community to consider whether the ban should be re-instituted and made indefinite. He seems incapable of editing constructively and moving towards consensus. He displays an open contempt for those with which he disagrees and often fails to assume good faith.