User:RooftopWriter/Aimee Cox/Squinard Peer Review

Peer Review

 * Hey, so great work thus far. I can see you aren't short of information, which is great, however most of the information is in the lead. I assume this is because you haven't exactly found where each piece fits into the article. Ideally, there are some facts that would fit in different sections, despite being in the same sentence. For instance much of the lead post first paragraph could potentially fit into the career section, as long as it is divided up accordingly. Content, while disorganized is good, however there is a pretty strong bias in favor of the subject (i.e. make sure to include some criticism as to remain as neutral as possible. Make sure to cite every fact, even when it is repeated (ex: In 2015, Cox published her first book Shapeshifters, an ethnographic study of young Black women in Detroit, aged 15-22). Make sure to include some sources that the average person may not be able to find. A lot of the sources were purely based around summary, however, critical reception to her books(both positive and negative) might be a good thing to include. That being said, all the links are working. It would be great to see some images, perhaps by using google search with CC turned on. The article is a great starting place, but make sure to continue to diversify and expand your list of sources (this might still be a stub). Regardless, good job!