User:Rose.catkins/sandbox

Blanqueamiento, or whitening, is a social, political, and economic practice used to improve the race (mejorar la raza) towards whiteness. The term blanqueamiento is rooted in Latin America and is used more or less synonymous with racial whitening. However, blanqueamiento can be considered in both the symbolic and biological sense Symbolically, blanqueamiento represents an ideology that emerged out of legacies of European Colonialism, described by Anibal Quijano’s theory of Coloniality of Power, which caters to white dominance in social hierarchies Biologically, blanqueamiento is the process of whitening by marrying a lighter skinned individual in order to produce lighter-skinned offspring.

Definition
Peter Wade argues that blanqueamiento is a historical process that can be linked to nationalism. When thinking about nationalism the ideologies behind it stem from national identity which according to Peter Wade is “a construction of the past and the future” ., where the past is understood as being more traditional and backwards. Past demographics of Puerto Rico were heavily black and Indian influenced because the country partook in the slave trade and was simultaneously home to many indigenous groups. Therefore understanding blanqueamiento as it relates to modernization, modernization is then understood as a guidance in the direction away from black and indigenous roots. Modernization then happened as described by Wade as “the increasing integration of blacks and Indians into modern society, where they will mix in and eventually disappear, taking their primitive culture with them”. This kind of implementation of blanqueamiento takes place in a societies that have historically always been led by ‘white’ people whose guidance would carry “the country away from its past, which began in indianness and slavery” with the hopes of promoting the intermixing of bodies in order to have a predominantly white skinned society.

Blanqueamiento as related to Mestizaje
The formation of mestizaje emerged in the shift of Latin America towards multiculturalist perspectives and policies. Mestizaje has been considered problematic by many U.S. scholars because it sustains racial hierarchies and celebrates blanqueamiento. For example, Swanson argues that although mestizaje is not a physical embodiment of whitening, it is “not so much about mixing, as it about a progressive whitening of the population”.

Another possibility when considering mestizaje as it relates to blanqueamiento, is by understanding mestizaje as a concept that encourages mixedness, but differs from the concept of blanqueamiento on the basis of the end goal for mestizaje. As Peter Wade states, “it celebrates the idea of difference in a democratic, non-hierarchical form. Rather than envisioning a gradual whitening, it holds up the general image of the mestizo in which racial, regional, and even class differences are submerged into a common identification with mixedness” On the same coin, when thinking about blanqueamiento, the future goal takes up the same theme of mixing. The difference between them is that while Mestizaje glorifies the mixing of all people to reach an end goal of having a brown population, blanqueamiento has the end goal of whiteness. The outcome of mestizaje mixing would lead to “ the predominance of the mestizo” and is not “construed necessarily as (a) whitened mestizo”. Most importantly however, both of these ideologies links emerging nationhood with the predominance of the mestizo or the whitened population.

Blanqueamiento and National Policy
Blanqueamiento was enacted in national policies of many Latin American countries at the turn of the 20th century. In most cases, these policies promoted European immigration as a means to whiten the population.

Brazil

Blanqueamiento was circulated in national policy throughout Brazil in the late 19th and early 20th century. Blanqueamiento policies emerged in the aftermath of the Abolition era and the beginning of Brazil’s first republic (1888-1889). In order to dilute/dissolve the black ‘race’, Brazil executed public measures to increase European immigration, where more than 1 million Europeans arrived in Sao Paulo between 1890 and 1914. The state and federal government funded and subsidized immigrant travels, where immigrants arrived from Portugal, Spain, Italy, Russia, Germany, Austria, France and the Netherlands. Claims that white blood would eventually eliminate black blood were found in accounts of immigration statistics. Created in the late 19th century, Brazil’s Directoria Geral de Estatistica (DGE) has conducted demographic censuses and managed to measure the progress of whitening as successful in Brazil.

Cuba

At the beginning of the 20th century, the Cuban government created immigration laws that invested more than $1 million into recruiting Europeans into Cuba in order to whiten the state. High participation of blacks in independence movements threatened white elitist power and when the 1899 Census showed that more than ⅓ of Cuba’s population was colored, white migration started to gain support. Political blanqueamiento began in 1902 after the U.S. occupation, where migration of “undesirables” (i.e. blacks) became prohibited in Cuba. Immigration policies supported the migration of entire families. Between 1902-1907 nearly 128,000 Spaniards entered Cuba, and officially in 1906, Cuba created its immigration law that funded white migrants. However, many european immigrants did not stay in Cuba and came solely for the sugar harvest, returning to their homes during the off seasons. Although some 780,000 Spaniards migrated between 1902-1931, only 250,000 stayed. By the 1920s, Blanqueamiento through national policy had effectively failed.

Social Blanqueamiento
Social blanqueamiento happens in many Latin American countries and can take the form of ethnic self-identification. For example, when examining the Puerto Rican census and the different ethnic categories of the population, the self-categorization of ‘white’ became an increasing social trend despite the rich Puerto Rican history of slave trade during the 1800’s. Due to the slave trade and the intermixing of bodies, the phenotypic composition of the population in Puerto Rico was dramatically impacted. “One consequence of the increase of African Slaves was a change in the racial composition of the population. The largest proportion (55.6%) of people “of Color” was recorded in 1820 and was subsequently reduced. In 1864 52.4% of the population was “white” ”. Then as the Census continued through the decades the dramatic decrease of non-white categories became a trend. “The category of “white” remained intact and the percentage of the population it accounted for increased from 61.8 % in 1899 to 80.5% in 2000. At the same time, the proportion of people classified as “nonwhite” fell from 38.2% to 19.%”.

Economic Blanqueamiento
Blanqueamiento can also be accomplished through economic achievement. Many scholars have argued that money has the ability to whiten, where wealthier individuals are more likely to be classified as white, regardless of phenotypic appearance. It is by this changing of social status that blacks achieve blanqueamiento. In his study, Marcus Eugenio Oliveira Lima showed that groups of Brazilians succeeded more when whitened.

Blanqueamiento has also been seen as a way to better the economy. In the case of Brazil, immigration policies that would help whiten the nation were seen as progressive ways to modernize and achieve capitalism. In Cuba, blanqueamiento policies limited economic opportunities for African descendants, resulting in their reduced upward mobility in education, property, and employment sectors.

Blanqueamiento in the U.S.
Blanqueamiento in the U.S. as most evidently seen takes on the form of what would be termed racial whitening within the media. Sports entertainment is predominantly a space where the athletes are almost all black, but despite the dominance of black athletes on the court, in the sports office itself there are predominantly white men. The Kerner Commission Report that was published in 1968, singled out and criticized the sports media. The report stated, “We have found a significant imbalance between what actually happened in our cities and what the newspaper, radio, and television coverage of the riots told us happened.” When attempting to address this issue of racial whitening due to the imbalance of population representation within the media, the American Society of News Editors (ASNE) created a plan to “ hire and promote enough people of color and women in its newsrooms by 2000 or sooner, to be the equivalent of the U.S. minority population.” When the plan failed to be reached by the year 2000, the ASNE then changed their year goal to be enacted by 2025. Since their first failure, there has not been much progress made in the diversification in sports media and what is “More troublesome, where the industry showed some forward progress between 1978 and 2000 toward diversity, the most recent evidence showed... black journalists declined more than 30 percent since 2001.”