User:Roserey/User:EGC94/Ranu Mukherjee/Roserey Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(EGC94)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:EGC94/Ranu Mukherjee


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article is very well organized concise and easy to read which makes the reader interested and helps them understand the subject.

One thing I would change was the lead as it is one sentence and to me it just feels that it is standing alone. It’s very concise which is a good thing but perhaps giving it a bit more length to it.

All content is relevant to the topic and is up to date. I do love the underrepresented topic and how there are links to any questions a reader may ask about a certain subject brought up in the article.

You stayed on a neutral ground and gave an informative tone which is amazing for this article.

I believe we can add a bit more information to the article. The links too the art works and where they are at is amazing but perhaps explaining some art work in this article will get a sense of the artist more as a whole. This is art so there is so much meaning hidden in their own artworks that reflects them as a person. With some added works this article will be great.

There are many sources available in this article and all of the links work. The sources are the bread and butter of this article which I truly loved looking at and exploring each one to learn more about the artist. One of my favorite things is that you provide links to subjects that expanded your article like feminism and colonialism which help the reader find an explanation rather quickly if they do not understand that said subject.

Great Job!