User:Roxlef/Near-death studies/Seankingston101 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

What could they have done better?

on the part of negative effects, they could have developed on the negative effects, giving a deeper explanation to what these negative effects are, instead of giving one sentence, and adding a link. Jdj44 has to check his spelling when talking about the near death researcher. he may also want to work on his sentence structure. Adding the results of the John Hagan's article would be good.