User:Rpsenka/Pelican eel/Carnesm Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rpsenka


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rpsenka/Pelican eel


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pelican eel

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think the edits you've made to the article are good overall and make the article stronger and more informative. I think the feeding section you've added is especially informative because the information you've added is new and different from that present in the diet section. The animal adaptation section is also good, but I would recommend changing the wording so that it all says "pelican eel" as not to confuse people since the beginning of the article says "gulper eel" refers to multiple genuses and I am uncertain of if you mean to do that as well. In addition the last sentence has no source directly attached to it.

You said you were worried about your wording and making it sound un-biased and precise, but it seems to me that is good. The only wording that may need to be changed is when you say "it may be likely" in the second sentence of the feeding section.

The only issue I had with your references is that #3 does not seem to link to anything when I click on it, but that may be something on my end rather than yours.