User:Rpsenka/Pelican eel/Chris7M Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lmoberley


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lmoberley/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pelican eel

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

- The leading sentence is a good introductory statement that gives an interesting preview of what will be discussed and provides new information about the mechanism of pelican eel lunge feeding.

- Where exactly will this information be placed within the Description section of the article? The lead sentence is good in that it allows the proposed information to be placed almost anywhere in the first paragraph of the Description section and still make sense. Maybe adding this proposed paragraph right before the sentence starting with "When it feeds on prey.." would make the most sense.

Content:

- The content added is definitely relevant and up to date. It provides relevant information regarding how the pelican eel is able to open its jaws so widely to pursue prey.

- Minor typo: Punctuation should be changed in "...spread horizontally, This un-spreading..." from a comma to a period.T

Tone/Balance:

- The content is neutral and adds relevant information that benefits the article overall.

Sources:

- The source is up to date and credible and the paraphrasing looks good.

- Perhaps adding another source could make the added information even more strong. I know information is probably limited so it might be challenging to find another relevant source.

Organization:

- The information is well-written, concise, and clearly explains the biological morphing mechanism of action employed by the pelican eel to lunge feed.