User:Rrami052/Homo erectus/Jramo059 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rrami052


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rrami052/Homo_erectus?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Homo erectus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

To begin, it is important to address that this article is quite tough to add to being that it has so much information to it already and looks to be very well written. I think it will be somewhat hard to find new information to add to it. That being said, my peer did find a very interesting quote to add to the section they chose to add to from the article. This quote further explained the idea of why there are variants among the homo erectus population which was found in many geographical areas. They cited their sentence with where they got this information from and the quote from the text was not copied directly, it followed the Wiki guidelines in using their own words.

I still do think there should be more added. Maybe my peer could research homo erectus and filtering their finding to new studies done and new ideas that may have been released to add a new section on new discoveries or ideas that regard the Homo erectus. The section on extinction is also very short compared to the other sections and is very important to this topic. There may be more information on possible extinction theories or discoveries that my peer could add into that section. Describing the climate that was talked about in that section could be a great start.

All in all, my peer does look to have a good understand in the guidelines that need to be followed to contribute to the article and I believe they will continue to add to the article efficiently.