User:Rrichter456/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * The Giver


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Several sentences use language that sounds as if it were written from a personal perspective.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * The article does talk about a female author, but besides that it does not tackle any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * There are some incidents of vandalism and unnecessary comments on the Talk Page of the article.
 * Sources
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * The article is tagged for having not enough citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * All of the citation links I checked worked and all of the sources seem reliable.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * John Mulaney


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article seems to be written neutrally.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * The article does tackle the issues of John Mulaney's substance abuse and recovery.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * There are active Wikipedians on the talk page and they are debating whether or not certain information is reliable in the article.
 * Sources
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Each claim has a citation. There are some citations that come a sentence or two after a claim is initially introduced, but they are all there.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citation links that I checked all work and the sources used are mostly reliable. There are some sources that come from recovered archived files, but otherwise they are all reliable.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Legend (Lu Novel)


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant but there is information in the lead section that is not then further mentioned again in the body of the article, sections are not clearly labeled all of the time, a lot of information is lacking in the article such as more information in the reception section, and the lead section needs to be further expanded to truly capture the information in the article.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is written neutrally for the most part. The reception is weak and there may be some negative point of views not explained fully in this section that are not mentioned at all, but this claim is uncertain.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * The article is about a book written by a Chinese woman (although her ethnicity is not mentioned).
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The article's talk page does have several posts but the people posting them do not seem to be that active and do not receive many responses.
 * Sources
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Each claim does have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citations are not reliable. I clicked on one citation link to find a page written only 10% in English with no mention whatsoever to the novel described in the Wikipedia article.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Margherita of Savoy


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the article's content is relevant to the topic
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is written neutrally.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Aside from the fact that Margherita of Savoy is a woman, other identifiers of hers are not underrepresented or misrepresented on Wikipedia.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The talk page does not seem to be that active aside for a debate over the proper name of the article.
 * Sources
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Each claim does have a citation, but there are not a lot of different citations (there are only eight sources cited in the article).
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Some of the citations are reliable and other lead to sketchy websites that do not seem reliable.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * King Princess


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is written neutrally.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * This article is about an LGBTQ+ female singer.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * There has been a lot of talk on the Talk page, mostly in a debate on King Princess's pronouns.
 * Sources
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Each claim does have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citations all seem to be reliable and relatively recent (which is mostly due to her more recent rise to fame).