User:Rshaporda/Philodendron hederaceum/Sharkboy3 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Rshaporda
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Some of the content on the lead could be updated. The content that is added is relevant to the topic. The new content also fills in some of the missing information. The tone is professional and the content is not biased. The content all has reliable sources and is cited properly. The content is pretty easy to read and understand. Some images could be added to help identify this plant and to help the reader see what they are learning. The content has a good overall structure.