User:Rsjaffe/PROD log

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2021

 * Spiculated mass: PROD; notified 23:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:NOTDIC. Dictionary definition, not encyclopedic entry.
 * Matías De Stefano: BLP PROD; notified 17:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Slug (projectile): PROD; notified 23:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition MOS:NOTDIC
 * Character-count integrity: PROD; notified 23:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Xylology: PROD; notified 23:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Vascular congestion: PROD; notified 23:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Line (electrical engineering): PROD 23:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Revival (theatre): PROD; notified 23:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Sylvatic: PROD; notified 23:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * On the razzle: PROD; notified 23:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Class (education): PROD; notified 23:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Sip (kinship): PROD; notified 23:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Parley: PROD; notified 23:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Sarmentose (botany): PROD; notified 23:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Secund: PROD; notified 23:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Testing reliability: PROD; notified 23:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Ergatocracy: PROD; notified 23:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Sitelet: PROD; notified 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Alamin: PROD; notified 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Apertura tabularum: PROD; notified 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Liquidity forecast: PROD; notified 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Miswart: PROD; notified 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Trafficability: PROD; notified 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Epeolatry: PROD; notified 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Dynamic manipulation: PROD; notified 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Tax investigation: PROD; notified 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Benedictional: PROD; notified 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Inclined rig: PROD; notified 23:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Torcedor: PROD; notified 23:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Votive office: PROD; notified 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Optimal mechanism: PROD; notified 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Solemnization: PROD; notified 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Opening narration: PROD; notified 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Divesting abandonment: PROD; notified 23:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Directional well: PROD; notified 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Reading Clerk: PROD; notified 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Mutamadiyah: PROD; notified 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Tomentum (anatomy): PROD; notified 23:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Lifestyle magazine: PROD; notified 16:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Autonomous circuit: PROD; notified 16:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Tenancy (law): PROD; notified 16:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Fire Queen (Fire Department): PROD; notified 16:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Unincorporated Urban Community: PROD; notified 16:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Legal benefit: PROD; notified 16:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Baghwanan: PROD; notified 16:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Iyabōn: PROD; notified 16:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
 * Distant Tides: PROD; notified 02:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:NALBUM not notable. Also, was created by a sockpuppet that was creating other non-notable heavy metal listings.
 * Sow's ear effect: PROD 22:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unreferenced, at best a dictionary definition.
 * Kutaisi Institute of Medicine: PROD; notified 19:43, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Nothing in the article is referenced, and I can't find evidence that the school still exists. The official website is dead. Most web references to this school appear to be copied from wikipedia.
 * General (Zimbabwe): PROD; notified 20:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Duplicates information in Military ranks of Zimbabwe. No reason to exist separately.
 * Government district: PROD; notified 21:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:NOTDIC Dictionary definition

September 2021

 * Summit County Fairgrounds Arena Complex: PROD; notified 03:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: non-notable building
 * Tower 115: PROD; notified 03:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: non-notable building

November 2021

 * Zalman Shazar Junior High School: PROD; notified 05:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No references, not even a hint of notability in the text.
 * Like a thief in the night: PROD; notified 19:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unreferenced and no indication of notability
 * Petrel HUG: PROD; notified 02:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: fails WP:SIGCOV
 * Take One (song): PROD; notified 05:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: no evidence of notability, already have entry for album, no need for individual track entry

December 2021

 * Caleb K. Zia: PROD; notified 00:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Only reference is broken. Cannot find any significant coverage of person.

January 2022

 * The Immunity Zone: PROD; notified 04:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No indication of notability whatsoever.
 * Extension of the Wish: PROD; notified 04:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM
 * Chimera (Andromeda album): PROD; notified 04:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM
 * Manifest Tyranny: PROD; notified 04:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM
 * Andromeda (Swedish band): PROD; notified 04:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:BAND

February 2022

 * Gwibber: PROD; notified 00:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. All primary sources.
 * Judy Durham (EP): PROD; notified 19:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM
 * Gas (Gas album): PROD; notified 19:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM
 * Jane Richardson (author): PROD; notified 20:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:AUTHOR
 * František Brzák: PROD; notified 00:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NOLYMPICS
 * Josef Dusil: PROD; notified 00:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NOLYMPICS
 * List of tourist attractions in Visakhapatnam district: PROD; notified 02:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of South African tourist attractions: PROD; notified 02:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Tehran Province: PROD; notified 02:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Bath: PROD; notified 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Bahrain: PROD; notified 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Riga: PROD; notified 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Terre Haute, Indiana: PROD; notified 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Quincy, Illinois: PROD; notified 02:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Agra: PROD; notified 19:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Ahmedabad: PROD; notified 19:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Allentown, Pennsylvania: PROD; notified 19:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Anantapur district: PROD; notified 22:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Bhopal: PROD; notified 22:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Bhubaneswar: PROD; notified 22:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh: PROD; notified 22:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Charlotte, North Carolina: PROD; notified 22:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * Cancer recurrence: PROD; notified 17:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Outdated information, misses lots of subtleties about cancer classifications that greatly affect recurrence rates within the types listed, duplicates information in the main pages addressing each without ensuring that it accurately duplicates the info.

March 2022

 * List of tourist attractions in China: PROD; notified 02:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Coimbatore: PROD; notified 02:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Dehradun: PROD; notified 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Delhi: PROD; notified 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Edmonton: PROD; notified 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Eluru: PROD; notified 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Ganja: PROD; notified 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Greater Orlando: PROD; notified 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Guntur district: PROD; notified 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Hamilton, Ontario: PROD; notified 02:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Hong Kong: PROD; notified 02:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Indonesia: PROD; notified 02:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

May 2022

 * User expectations: PROD; notified 21:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No evidence of notability. Seems like a rehash of parts of user experience.
 * Consciousness! (Eric Kloss album): PROD; notified 21:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM

June 2022

 * Rhonda Pownell: BLP PROD; notified 03:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Pierre Fouyssac: BLP PROD; notified 23:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Valynce Te Whare: BLP PROD; notified 00:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Heinz Werner Wessler: BLP PROD; notified 20:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yam thapa: BLP PROD; notified 15:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Retro Respective: BLP PROD; notified 22:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sabhakunwar Kushawaha: BLP PROD; notified 02:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Mohammad Nurul Amin Piash: BLP PROD; notified 00:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Asadollah Sanii: BLP PROD; notified 02:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Mika Koide: BLP PROD; notified 01:12, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Gopika Ramesh: BLP PROD; notified 19:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Iain Greenshields: BLP PROD; notified 02:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Brad Bose: BLP PROD; notified 23:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Viktor Artemenko: BLP PROD; notified 16:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Neverov Alexander Nikolaevich: BLP PROD; notified 15:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * M. Ismael: BLP PROD; notified 16:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

 * Evan Doody: BLP PROD; notified 08:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Rory O'Connor (Actor): BLP PROD; notified 08:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * PRANTIK PAKHIRA: BLP PROD; notified 21:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Raman k jangwal: BLP PROD; notified 08:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Pedro Espinosa Lorenzo: BLP PROD; notified 18:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Djalil Palermo: BLP PROD; notified 13:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Michael Fredo: BLP PROD; notified 15:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Narottam Lal Joshi: BLP PROD; notified 07:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

 * List of Schoenus species: PROD; notified 20:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Material moved back into Schoenus (plant) as this division of information made it awkward to reference and parent page was very short.