User:Rsjaffe/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2021

 * Second Nature at Reads Creek: nominated at AfD; notified 19:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: not notable. a nursery selling plants. only ref is a link to the nursery's web site. web search only finds listings for the nursery, no notable references.
 * Irish twins: nominated at AfD; notified 15:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Just a dictionary definition. WP:NOT
 * Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge: nominated at AfD; notified 21:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Article for a department in a school of medicine at the University of Cambridge. Nothing in the article to make it notable, has had notability template on it since 2013.
 * Institute of Control and Computation Engineering of the University of Zielona Góra: nominated at AfD; notified 22:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Department of a university. Nothing notable about the department, just a listing.
 * Malibu (Toronto): nominated at AfD; notified 16:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:NBUILDING. Nothing about notability except the public art. Either this should be deleted or the article should be about the art if someone thinks the art is notable.
 * Kerf loss: nominated at AfD; notified 04:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:NOTDIC dictionary definition
 * Paradoxical intention: nominated at AfD; notified 21:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Already covered in Logotherapy article. Much of the content not covered in the Logotherapy article has been challenged or is unreferenced.
 * Standard Chartered Bank Nepal: nominated at AfD; notified 01:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:ORG Notability notice on page for 10 years without improvement. No significant secondary sources.

September 2021

 * Don Goldwater: nominated at AfD; notified 21:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:POLITICIAN Failed candidate in one race
 * Sow's ear effect: nominated at AfD 19:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No evidence this phrase exists. All google hits are copied from the Wikipedia page. It is either a neologism WP:NEO or a dictionary definition WP:NAD.
 * Anti-Canadian sentiment: nominated at AfD; notified 20:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:PERMASTUB Not a notable subject on its own. Only item doesn't seem very notable. If someone wanted to keep the info, they could add it to Brazil–Canada relations. Funnily, the talk page for this article is huge.

November 2021

 * Vitamin A2: nominated at AfD; notified 19:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Original research, insufficient secondary sources.
 * Drum RNA motif: nominated at AfD; notified 02:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Primary source only. No secondary sources for this scientific claim. Too soon for wikipedia.

January 2022

 * Mohamed Sherif Kamel: nominated at AfD; notified 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Sources only have fleeting reference to his name. Fails WP:NBASIC
 * List of management of The Walt Disney Company: nominated at AfD; notified 16:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Superfluous over detailed list that shouldn’t be separate from the main company article.

February 2022

 * Bhanwar Singh Shekhawat: nominated at AfD; notified 19:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails notability.
 * The Grove at Shrewsbury: nominated at AfD; notified 20:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails notability. No significant coverage.
 * List of tourist attractions in Kolar district: nominated at AfD; notified 01:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a travel guide. WP:NOTGUIDE
 * List of tourist attractions in Toronto: nominated at AfD; notified 06:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a travel guide. WP:NOTGUIDE
 * List of tourist attractions in Agra: nominated at AfD; notified 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Bhubaneswar: nominated at AfD; notified 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Ahmedabad: nominated at AfD; notified 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh: nominated at AfD; notified 01:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * List of tourist attractions in Bhopal: nominated at AfD; notified 01:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Policies violated by this page:WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
 * Triedinstvo: nominated at AfD; notified 04:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NALBUM, no evidence notability. Searched, didn't find anything.
 * Shanti Niketan, Delhi: nominated at AfD; notified 04:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Just advertising for a neighborhood. No significant independent coverage. Fails WP:GEOLAND

May 2022

 * Sai Satcharitra: nominated at AfD; notified 18:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: no significant secondary sources, fails WP:BOOKCRIT
 * The Third World War Book: nominated at AfD; notified 18:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: no significant secondary coverage, fails WP:BOOKCRIT
 * BIND-014: nominated at AfD; notified 19:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG.
 * Erwin Emata: nominated at AfD; notified 22:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NBIO. Other than listed as climbing Mt. Everest, no significant secondary independent coverage. Most of what I could find are copies from the Wikipedia article.
 * Manyavar: nominated at AfD; notified 19:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Maynavar is the title of the article, but that is just a product line from the company Vedant Fashions Ltd. Most references are for the company. Fails WP:GNG for the product line, and the company fails too. If someone thinks this is worth rescuing, they should create a Vedant Fashions page instead.
 * Arthur Fabi: nominated at AfD; notified 22:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails to meet notability at WP:NCURL.
 * Heights of European monarchs: nominated at AfD; notified 23:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: List does not meet notability guidelines: see WP:NLIST. Needs to have reliable significant coverage of the topic "Heights of European Monarchs", rather than just coverage of individual's heights.
 * Heights of vice presidents of the United States: nominated at AfD; notified 23:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: List does not meet notability guidelines: see WP:NLIST. Needs to have reliable significant sources that cover the topic "Heights of vice presidents of the United States", rather than just coverage of individual's heights.
 * Leah Parry: nominated at AfD; notified 23:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NOLY, and doesn't have significant secondary source coverage WP:SPORTBASIC.
 * Ariel Stoltz: nominated at AfD; notified 23:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails to meet notability for sportspeople. No significant secondary coverage WP:SPORTBASIC.
 * Derick Hall: nominated at AfD; notified 23:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NCOLLATH and no significant secondary source coverage.
 * Mary Liedel: nominated at AfD; notified 00:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:COLLATH and WP:SPORTBASIC. No significant independent secondary coverage.
 * Jordon Hall: nominated at AfD; notified 02:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails notability. No significant secondary source coverage. WP:SPORTCRIT
 * Lindsey Stirling Summer Tour: nominated at AfD; notified 02:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Needs significant coverage in multiple independent sources. Doesn't have it. WP:NTOUR
 * Doruk Dora: nominated at AfD; notified 03:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NBASKETBALL and insufficient significant secondary coverage so fails WP:SPORTBASIC.
 * Chenab Park: nominated at AfD; notified 22:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No significant secondary independent references to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG
 * Gabol Park: nominated at AfD; notified 22:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No significant secondary coverage of the park. References have little or nothing to do with the topic. Fails WP:GNG
 * Şevket Yorulmaz: nominated at AfD; notified 23:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. No in-depth secondary coverage. Checked Turkish Wikipedia too, no in-depth coverage from sources there either.
 * Puckerbutt: nominated at AfD; notified 03:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Duplicates content in Chili pepper and additional information only serves as advertisement for a company.
 * American Polarity Therapy Association: nominated at AfD; notified 16:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: References provide only passing mention of the organization and are mostly about polarity therapy, not the organization. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:ORGCITE. Search finds nothing better.
 * American University of Nigeria library: nominated at AfD; notified 01:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No viable reason to be separate from the main American University of Nigeria article. No need for a merge either, as information is too specific (e.g., they have a telephone) for an encyclopedia listing.
 * Internet speed test: nominated at AfD; notified 23:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Should be redirect to Measuring network throughput. Redirect reverted by article creator, so bringing to AfD for review.
 * KRMS-LD: nominated at AfD; notified 16:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No significant coverage in independent secondary sources. Fails notability WP:GNG.

June 2022

 * Kevin McBrearty: nominated at AfD; notified 17:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails to meet WP:GNG criteria. Sources are either passing mentions or primary, and primary cannot be used for notability.
 * Jack O'Brien (Gaelic footballer): nominated at AfD; notified 17:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Sources are not significant coverage, and the interview is a primary source and cannot count for notability.
 * Nathan McElwaine: nominated at AfD; notified 18:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. No significant secondary independent sources.
 * List of airports under construction: nominated at AfD; notified 04:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: See WP:NLIST. For example One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. This is also inherently unmaintainable, as construction status changes across this large list continually.
 * Roger Jacobs: nominated at AfD; notified 19:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Search shows only overall stats, same as refs on page. Fails WP:NCURL and WP:SPORTBASIC. Needs significant personal coverage in multiple independent secondary sources, none seen.
 * Jack O'Loughlin (hurler): nominated at AfD; notified 20:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails notability. First article just a listing, second is not found, searched paper web site and Donegal Sport Hub, sounds like an interview anyway (primary source, not valid for notability), third just has his name listed. Search finds no significant secondary independent indepth articles about him.
 * Yuzuki Yamato: nominated at AfD; notified 23:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails notability. References either just list him as a participant or are bare statistics sites. From WP:SPORTCRIT: Although statistics sites may be reliable sources, they are not sufficient by themselves to establish notability. Search just finds more stat sites.
 * Andreas Renner: nominated at AfD; notified 23:34, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: other than sexual harassment accusation, not notable. WP:BLP1E applies. Not enough to be in Wikipedia.
 * List of Assyriologists: nominated at AfD; notified 04:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails notability WP:NLIST. List subject is not notable. Furthermore this is unmaintainable: no way to identify all the Assyriologists in the world.
 * Richard Pretsel: nominated at AfD; notified 23:53, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: According to WP:NCURL:Significant coverage is **likely** to exist for a curler if they1. Have won a World Curling Tour event or participated in a Grand Slam of Curling event.2. Have won a medal at one of the following World Curling Federation sanctioned events: the World Junior Curling 3. Championships, World Senior Curling Championships, European Curling Championships, World Mixed Curling Championship, or Pacific-Asia Curling Championships.4. Have won a medal at the Canadian Junior Curling Championships.5. Have won the Canadian Mixed Curling Championship, Canadian Senior Curling Championship, or Canadian Mixed Doubles Curling Trials.6. Are member of the Canadian Curling Hall of Fame or the WCF Hall of Fame.Richard Pretsel meets none of these. Also did search and found the following sources. Generally need two independent reliable significant coverage of the person for WP:GNG. Found none.
 * Tameko Star: nominated at AfD; notified 20:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Search finds no significant independent secondary (e.g., not an interview) sources about Tameko Star. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER.
 * Hasan Masurica: nominated at AfD; notified 23:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: See Articles for deletion/Hasan Masurica for a thorough explanation of the problems with this article. Much of this information is fantastical.
 * San Antonio High School Football Records: nominated at AfD; notified 23:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NLIST. Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable... A list of records at a particular high school is not notable and is also very difficult to maintain, as it is very unlikely that every performance is documented in a reliable source.
 * Too Lost: nominated at AfD; notified 02:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. No significant independent secondary coverage. The one review of the business that I could find was on a site blacklisted by Wikipedia, which means that that article must not be used to help establish notability.
 * Phasing and Recoverability: nominated at AfD; notified 03:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No reliable secondary independent articles about the book. The two reviews in the article are on user-generated sites so do not meet the reliability standard.
 * Reza Mozafari Manesh: nominated at AfD; notified 15:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: All refs are mentions of displays in gallery. No in-depth secondary independent coverage of the person himself. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST.
 * Priyanka Meher: nominated at AfD; notified 02:15, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Was deleted a couple of months ago: see Articles for deletion/Priyanka Meher for details. Since then, has collaborated with others and has new references. But the new references only name-check her, nothing in-depth. Still fails notability even with the new information.
 * Flying Returns: nominated at AfD; notified 02:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No reason for this to be separate from main Air India article. See WP:PRODUCT. "If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy."
 * Namify: nominated at AfD; notified 23:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: See WP:ORGCRIT. No significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary independent sources. See lots of press release coverage and name-checks."A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals. The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing Wikipedia for advertising and promotion. As such, the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article."
 * A-Navigation (Autonomous Navigation): nominated at AfD; notified 18:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No secondary references found. Originator of article blocked for advertising. One of the other articles deleted, Marinet, is the company making A-Navigation. Fails WP:GNG, probably written for pay.
 * Mark Kamrath: nominated at AfD; notified 20:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Probable autobiography. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Meets none of the 8 criteria listed there.1. "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.2. "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.3. "The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).4. "The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.5. "The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.6. "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.7. "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.8. "The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area."
 * Houston Premium Outlets: nominated at AfD; notified 23:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals. The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing Wikipedia for advertising and promotion. As such, the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article. The source table below quotes the applicable part of the "Examples of trivial coverage" within the WP:CORPDEPTH policy.
 * 2027 Indian presidential election: nominated at AfD; notified 19:58, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:TOOSOON. About an event 5 years in the future, no reason to be notable currently.
 * 2027 Indian vice-presidential election: nominated at AfD; notified 20:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Way too soon. WP:TOOSOON. No significant in-depth coverage yet.
 * Assessio: nominated at AfD; notified 19:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Search finds only trivial coverage. See Examples of trivial coverage in WP:CORPDEPTH for details. Reference 4, which has some information about the test, is an interview and thus fails the "independence" test for notability.
 * Audric Dandres: nominated at AfD; notified 21:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Refs in article aren’t in-depth independent secondary sources. I searched for sources: only one I found that appeared to have some content about him was an alumni source, so not independent/reliable.
 * Henry F. Wilde: nominated at AfD; notified 14:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Could not find any reliable independent secondary in-depth coverage of him. Fails WP:GNG and fails WP:AUTHOR.
 * Hell Gate (website): nominated at AfD; notified 16:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to be too soon. Fails WP:GNG, no significant secondary independent in-depth coverage. Also, notability is not inherited, so provenance of founders doesn’t affect decision.

July 2022

 * Jobaer Alam: nominated at AfD; notified 21:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: See Articles for deletion/Md. Jobaer Alam for some background. Career since then does not add notability. Article was recreated several times under Md. Jobaer Alam, which is now “salted” to discourage recreation.
 * List of left-handed United States presidents: nominated at AfD; notified 19:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NLIST. Trivia.
 * Next Goa Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 06:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * Next Indian general election in West Bengal: nominated at AfD; notified 17:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * 2023 Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON. References are not about the 2023 election.
 * 2023 Tripura Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON. References are not about the election.
 * 2023 Mizoram Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * 2023 Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * 2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * 2023 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * 2023 Meghalaya Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 17:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG as it is WP:TOOSOON.
 * Hiradello: nominated at AfD; notified 16:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No significant independent secondary coverage found. Refs 1&3 are unreliable, 2 is a broken link. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.
 * Dryer Vent Wizard: nominated at AfD; notified 19:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Only trivial mentions. See WP:CORPDEPTH for list of trivial mentions. Trivial mentions include “best of” lists and sponsorship of charities, which account for all the non primary sources in the article.
 * Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election: nominated at AfD; notified 06:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Way too early to have significant in-depth coverage other than speculation. Invites original research.
 * Purrple Cat (musician): nominated at AfD; notified 07:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Search finds only passing mentions. No significant independent reliable secondary coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.
 * List of number of Michelin restaurants in European countries: nominated at AfD; notified 13:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn’t have encyclopedic purpose, more like trivia. Fails WP:LISTN (read linked section for criteria). Also doesn’t list all European countries (see https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/countries-in-europe/ for example).
 * Chairs of the Psychonomic Society: nominated at AfD; notified 16:23, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Why? List without a purpose. Fails WP:GNG and fails WP:NLIST. No independent sources discussing in-depth the chairs of the psychonomic society.
 * Gazipur Cantonment Board High School: nominated at AfD; notified 07:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Was in draftspace since February. Author submitted it for approval, and it was rejected. Author recreated article in mainspace. It still fails notability. WP:NSCHOOL requires meeting either WP:GNG or WP:ORG. It fails both. I didn’t find any significant independent secondary reliable in-depth coverage.
 * Christopher Kenny: nominated at AfD; notified 08:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: None of the refs in the article in-depth independent secondary reliable sources. I cannot find any, either. Since name is fairly common, I also searched for name plus “preservation earth”. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO.

August 2022

 * Government Girls Science and Technical College Potiskum: nominated at AfD; notified 16:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Search found no independent secondary reliable in-depth coverage. Fails notability. See WP:NSCHOOL.
 * November 2068 lunar eclipse: nominated at AfD; notified 01:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a catalog of data. Need significant in-depth independent secondary coverage of this event for it to be notable. WP:TOOSOON.
 * May 2068 lunar eclipse: nominated at AfD; notified 01:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a catalog of data. Need significant in-depth independent secondary coverage of this event for it to be notable. WP:TOOSOON.
 * May 2086 lunar eclipse: nominated at AfD; notified 01:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a catalog of data. Need significant in-depth independent secondary coverage of this event for it to be notable. WP:TOOSOON.
 * November 2086 lunar eclipse: nominated at AfD; notified 01:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a catalog of data. Need significant in-depth independent secondary coverage of this event for it to be notable. WP:TOOSOON.
 * February 2056 lunar eclipse: nominated at AfD; notified 00:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:TOOSOON. No secondary independent in-depth coverage, only data related to the prediction. Best to merge into a list.
 * June 2057 lunar eclipse: nominated at AfD; notified 01:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:TOOSOON. Needs significant in-depth secondary coverage.

December 2022

 * Cowgirl (magazine): nominated at AfD; notified 19:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Search finds no significant coverage in reliable independent sources.
 * Brightside Roadside: nominated at AfD; notified 20:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Article is about a planned restaurant chain that hasn't opened yet. Many references are included in the article: the vast majority are reprints of a single news release (https://www.sharesmagazine.co.uk/news/market/LSE20221107070008_4569826/launch-of-roadside-restaurant-brand-brightside) as can be seen by the identical quotations. Only in-depth articles are about the former Little Chef brand, and none of those articles mention anything about this topic. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, in that the references all either meet the examples of trivial coverage, have no coverage at all, or are from corporate news releases.