User:Rst20xx/Tennis

I am currently attempting to tag all tennis pages with Template:WikiProject Tennis, together with importance levels for all non-player articles. Once this is done, I can start thinking about classes. See also WikiProject Tennis/Assessment and Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Tennis articles by quality

Non-articles

 * Categories - ✅
 * tagged as Cat-Class, NA-importance
 * Templates - ✅
 * tagged as Temp-Class, NA-importance
 * Disambiguation pages - ✅
 * tagged as Disambig-Class, NA-importance
 * WikiProject pages - ✅
 * tagged as Proj-Class, NA-importance
 * Portal pages - ✅
 * tagged as Portal-Class, NA-Importance
 * Images - ✅
 * tagged all images in Category:WikiProject Tennis as Image-Class, NA-importance
 * finding all the other images will be tricky, so I shall call this done
 * Lists - ✅
 * tagged many (if not all) as List-Class
 * All should have appropriate importance levels

Articles

 * Tournaments (e.g. French Open) - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Tournament years (e.g. 2005 French Open) - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Tournament events (e.g. 2005 French Open - Men's Singles) - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Shots and terminology - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Equipment - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * ATP seasons, WTA seasons and Tennis by year - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Tennis organisations, Davis Cup teams and Fed Cup teams - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Awards - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Court types - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Real tennis - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels, apart from players
 * Not done Classes
 * Wheelchair tennis - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels, apart from players
 * Not done Classes
 * Other forms of tennis - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * History - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Media - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Venues - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * Coaches - ✅
 * Not done importance or classes
 * Players - ✅
 * Not done importance or classes
 * Any other articles I've missed - ✅
 * All should have appropriate importance levels
 * Not done Classes
 * There were a fair few actually, most of which though had been created since I started the tagging spree

Updates
I think all mid-, high- or top-importance tournament articles should now be tagged as such - rst20xx (talk) 23:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC) - rst20xx (talk) 23:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Well okay, not all mid, but all the events that should be mid, as opposed to the tournaments, i.e. all Masters/Tier I events and up but not all ATP/WTA Tour tournaments. - rst20xx (talk) 02:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Top = 11 -> 44
 * High = 53 -> 134
 * Mid = 71 -> 810
 * Low = 116 -> 1002
 * Unknown = 888 -> 499

And today I did all the rest of the tourneys, and all the templates:
 * Top = 44 -> 57
 * High = 134 -> 138
 * Mid = 810 -> 1005
 * Low = 1002 -> 1748
 * NA = 0 -> 339
 * Unknown = 499 -> 382 (most of the remaining are players)

- rst20xx (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Temp-class = 0 -> 309
 * Cat-class = 0 -> 29 (going to work on that soon)
 * Dab-class = 0 -> 8 (ditto)
 * NA-class = 70-odd -> 0 (depreciated)
 * Unassessed = 915 -> 2899 :/

Right, all the Cats and templates are now done, plus Portals and Projects. And all the lists are List-class:
 * Top = 57 -> 69
 * High = 138 -> 146
 * Mid = 1005 -> 1022
 * Low = 1748 -> 1755
 * NA = 339 -> 1658
 * Unknown = 382 -> 394

-- rst20xx (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Project-class = 0 -> 20
 * Portal-class = 0 -> 36
 * Temp-class = 309 -> 345
 * Cat-class = 29 -> 1262
 * List-class = 0 -> 70
 * Unassessed = 2899 -> 2897
 * NA = 1658-> 1857

-- rst20xx (talk) 23:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Disambig-class = 8 -> 140
 * Image-class = 0 -> 56

Made this page - rst20xx (talk) 01:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Davis Cup teams, Fed Cup teams and Organisations means...
 * High = 146 -> 149
 * Mid = 1022 -> 1048
 * Low = 1755 -> 2021
 * Unknown = 394 -> 385


 * Unassessed = 2897 -> 3173

Okay, I've done lots and lots of fiddly bits, meaning that all that is left is coaches, players and anything I've missed. Rating these is somewhat subjective and certainly will involve looking at a lot of articles (as opposed to the other stuff, much of which you could give an importance level to by just looking at the name). So I'm simply going to tag them as part of WP-Tennis, and leave the importance levels up to others. So, one more (huge) step and my tagging spree is complete! Progress:
 * Top = 69 -> 75
 * High = 149 -> 204
 * Mid = 1048 -> 1081
 * Low = 2021 -> 2283
 * NA = 1857 -> 1861
 * Unknown = 385 -> 327 (a quick scan through and a few manual fixes, and I think this is now entirely players! Yay!)

-- rst20xx (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Unassessed = 3173 -> 3471

Okay, I've just finished up with that last spree! Over 2000 articles! Final progress report:
 * High = 204 -> 213
 * Mid = 1081 -> 1102
 * Low = 2283 -> 2517
 * NA = 1861 -> 1918
 * Unknown = 327 -> 2084 (All those players...)


 * GA = 1 -> 2 (We inherited Mario Power Tennis!)
 * Cat-class = 1262 -> 1314
 * List-class = 70 -> 72
 * Unassessed = 3471 -> 5491

And that's it! rst20xx (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

In Summary
The tagging spree took WP:Tennis from this: to this: And, additionally: and:
 * NA-importance = 0 -> 1918
 * Image-Class = 0 -> 56
 * Template-Class = 0 -> 343
 * Project-Class = 0 -> 27
 * Category-Class = 0 -> 1314
 * Disambig-Class = 0 -> 145
 * NA-Class = 70ish -> 0 (all went to Template-Class or Category-Class)
 * Portal-Class = 0 -> 36

I'd call that successful! 4652 articles newly tagged, and before I tagged the players, Unknown-importance was down to 327 articles, so I gave importance levels to most of the articles originally in there. rst20xx (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)