User:Rt3z7/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Marie-Anne Paulze Lavoisier


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * In the first paragraph in biography it doesn't mention her father's name until it just starts talking about him which was confusing the first time reading through it.
 * Still in the biography, who is Paul? Did they actually mean Paulze?


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?


 * What else could be improved?
 * When talking about Marie-Anne Paulze Lavoisier and her father and husband it was hard to follow who was being talked about


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * It doesn't talk about specific things that she actually does, are we able to find specifics? Or why is there only VERY general ideas?


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Rt3z7 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

~

Article Evaluation
John Napier

Things we would like to change
He was doing things between life and death besides just inventing the logarithm, like astronomy and alchemy potentially what was he doing?

Look through the book about his life and see what is in there (PDF is online)

Why does he think the way he does? He dropped out of school so what was he doing to continue thinking/make money?

Rt3z7 (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)