User:Rubee928/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Katara (Avatar: The Last Airbender)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it discusses a character in a children's tv show that I really enjoy. It matters because it goes into depth about the character for fans or people who want to learn more. My preliminary impression of this article is that there has been a fair amount of research done and the subjects are well-chosen and structured.

Evaluate the article
The lead's introductory sentence states three things: that Katara is a fictional character, which television shows she was in, and which television channel it was published by. This sentence is clear and concisely describes the topic.

The entire lead section does in fact discuss the major sections of the article briefly, and does not include any information that is not present in the article. The lead is completely concise for reader's to spend little time learning about broad and important information of the subject. The article's content is relevant to the topic, and is up-to-date. There does not seem to be any information in the article that does not belong or any information missing besides one of the topics, "Creation and conception", where I believe more information could be added about her creation. Also, I believe that the comics that include her could be talked about. The article does not deal with the equity gap. The tone of this article is neutral and does not seem to be biased when discussing topics like personality where it can come down to opinion. Instead, it was factual and agreeable to anyone who is not biased and seeking true statements. Other than the creation and conception topic, there are not any underrepresented over overrepresented topics. There does not seem to be any attempt to persuade the reader to favor a certain position or to lead the reader away from another. Inside the subsection, "The Legend of Korra" there are no citations to support the facts given. Otherwise, the article contains citations that are reliable secondary sources. The sources are mostly thorough and current and have a diverse spectrum of authors. Most of the links work but I have found one that does not: https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-SEB-70555. One source that could be better for the topic is: https://avatar.fandom.com/wiki/History_of_Katara_(Spring_100_AG). The article is well-written with no grammatical or spelling errors, and is easy to read. The images posted in the article do enhance the understanding of the topic and are well-captioned. They adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations and are laid out in a visually appealing way. The last image could have displayed a better angle. Most of the conversations are brief other than two of the conversations discussing Katara's abilities and her relationship with Aang, the main character. The article is rated as a C-class article and it is not part of any WikiProjects. The article's overall status is good. The strengths of this article is how in-depth the information is about the topic and how thorough and efficient it covered the topics. It could be improved by talking more about her appearance in comics and her creation. This article is well-developed.