User:Rubiii1231/Blastoma/4Yz12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Rubiii1231)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rubiii1231/Blastoma - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Blastoma - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think this article having more sources added was a good addition to better illustrate these concepts. The citation needed area in the molecular biology and treatment should be filled out. I think that the article for the most part looked good before the edits but the addition of sources is beneficial. The last four types of blastoma could also use another source to help expand on them further. Overall the article's formatting is good and allows the concepts to be separated and it helps them stand out better from one another.~