User:Rubisruiz/Evaluate an Article

User: Rubis Ruiz / Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Miami Dade College)
 * I Choose this article because i am current student of MDC and I will be working on an updated related to this page.

Lead

 * Guiding questions
 * I think that the title of the article is quite concise because it is clear that it is about MDC.
 * There is not found a description of the major sections
 * It includes a sentence that is not present on the article. ( It is the largest college in the Florida College System with over 165,000 students and the second-largest college or university in the United States. Miami Dade College's main campus, the Wolfson Campus, is in downtown Miami.)
 * The lead is concise, not overly detailed at all.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article'stopic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions
 * The article content is completely relevant to the topic.
 * The content is up to date.
 * Could be missing content, but all the content matches.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is neutral.
 * There are not any claims ,
 * the article explains what is MDC, and could be persuasive in favor to the institution.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions
 * In the references there may be articles that support the topic
 * the sources are relatively current, the links are functional, the available literature on the subject in addition to the one we can find in the references


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions
 * the artcile is easy to read, concise
 * not grammatical errors detected
 * it is well organized since it is broken into different sections


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions
 * there are not to many images
 * well captioned but it could have more images


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

the general state of the article in my opinion is good, I think it provides information of many general aspects of importance to the reader such as financial aid

the article can be improved by putting more photos and opinions of the student

I think the article is developed


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: