User:Ruby00269/Point estimation/Editor794 Peer Review

The August 23rd version of this article could be improved a lot. The first part of the Lead alludes to varying types of point estimators. The point estimators are simply listed in the article, with no explanation given to their methods or differences. It seems this was a substantial part of the edit made to date by you, so that's good.

The second part of the Lead relates point estimators to confidence intervals, and contrasts them with set estimators and distribution estimators. The latter two have not been expanded upon, though they are not relevant to the content of our class that this edit is being made for. Comparison to confidence intervals was a good addition to the article made by you, detailing what was prescribed by the Lead.

The citations given in the confidence interval section are a bit light. Claims such as "There are two major types of estimates:" and " It generally gives more information than point estimates and are preferred when making inferences." should be supported. Also, writing in the first-person with phrases such as "we are interested in..." "we are not interested only in..." might not be recommended for Wikipedia format, as they suggest subjectivism.

Significant edits were made on your part, contributing valuable information to article. Good job.