User:Rugtata/Oligosaprobe/Plewis77 Peer Review

I thought this was a very solid start, especially considering it doesn't look like the article had any contributions prior to you.

I am sure you just got started, but here are some tips I had to help keep you rolling.

- Maybe a sentence or two about the significance of Oligosaprobe's, perhaps to close out your intro section?

- Use header's once you get going... Helps reader find what's relevant to them.

Aside from that it looks great. Sources are reliable and cited correctly which is great. Content was also very neutral, didn't appear to be bias present. I think you just need more time to get going and get more information in there from more sources to round out the article. Most importantly, once you add more I just think the headers are super important. Great job.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rugtata


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rugtata/Oligosaprobe


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)