User:Runmiaogwu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:2 Fast 2 Furious

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I just picked on top of that list provided by wikipedia and picked one that looked familiar. But I clicked on it and it was such a mess that I had no idea what it was talking about.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead: There is not a clear lead that articulates the theme of the article.

Content: The content is confusing and the rhetoric is simple and even rude. And it's not neutral at all, putting up thoughts that are entirely its own.

Tone and Balance: The tone was unfriendly and and casual, and the formatting was confusing and did not reflect neutrality.

Sources and References: No sources were used and are not referenced

Organization and Writing Quality: Poor quality of writing and illogical organization

Images and Media: No images were used

Talk Page Discussion: What I've seen so far with this article is a person leaving a sentence they want to say, which is discussing some of it, but I don't think it has anything to do with what the article is supposed to be discussing.

Overall Impressions: The article has no references and is written by many authors. The content is illogical and does not have an overall overview. The content is not written in a neutral manner.