User:Runningblader/Archive one

to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 04:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Problem fixed/also being fixed Runningblader (talk)

Use of other users' pages
Please do not edit the user and user-talk pages of other users by redirecting them to your own. Also, do not use other users' pages for any other type of practice-editing or work-in-progress writing. DMacks (talk) 08:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of MorparScape
A tag has been placed on MorparScape requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. ukexpat (talk) 13:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted because the article did not assert that this web content has been recognized as notable, see WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of MorparScape
A tag has been placed on MorparScape requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; alex.muller (talk • edits) 00:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

MorparScape
I deleted the article MorparScape because it didn't become clear from the article how and why the subject was notable. Such articles can be speedy deleted per speedy deletion criterion A7. The notability criteria for web content are outlined in WP:WEB. Simply existing is not enough. If you can write a new article demonstrating how and why the subject is notable, you can be bold and do so. But I strongly recommend you read WP:N and WP:WEB before you start. If you disagree with the deletion, you can also request a deletion review. If you need help with this, you can leave a message on my user talk page and I'll help you out. A ecis Brievenbus 01:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine with me, but I have moved the sandbox you created from User:Runningblader Sandbox to User:Runningblader/Sandbox. With the slash, it becomes a subpage of your userpage, without the slash, it would be the userpage of, who doesn't exist. A  ecis Brievenbus 01:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Common procedure in such cases, when you think the article is ready to be moved back into the encyclopedia, is to request a deletion review, to ask for permission to move it back into the encyclopedia. As I said above, if you need help with that, you can leave me a message and I'll help you out. If you have any questions about Wikipedia in general, you can obviously leave me a message as well. A  ecis Brievenbus 01:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to MoRpArScApE, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 02:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You did not "find" it, you created it. That article (note the spelling) was highly inappropriate. Wikipedia admins do not "block other people" because you ask us to. We follow carefully laid out rules that are there to protect the integrity of Wikipedia. If you continue to create articles like MoRpArScApE, you will be blocked from editing here. Gwernol 02:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia/Sandbox
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Wikipedia/Sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Thin boy  00  @155, i.e. 02:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Your article is was inappropriate for Wikipedia; please read our core policies on verifiability and maintaining a neutral point of view. You article contains multiple breaches of these policies. Please do not move it into article space. Gwernol 02:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Morparscape sandbox
Your draft article at User:Runningblader/Sandbox still doesn't make clear how the subject is notable, per WP:WEB. Has Morparscape received any outside coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, for instance? A ecis Brievenbus 12:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with Aecis. You can't base Wikipedia articles on what you know -- they have to rely on independent sources.  NawlinWiki (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Summaries for The Black Pearl
An editor has nominated Summaries for The Black Pearl, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Move of your talk page
Please do not try to move your talk page again. In doing so you lost several important messages and seriously messed up the edit history, which we are legally required to maintain. Thanks, Gwernol 01:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Castle wars 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Castle wars 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gwernol 13:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Mineral
Are you aware of the fact that we have an article about minerals? If you wish to improve the article, you can be bold and do so. If you're not sure whether what you have in mind is an improvement, you can propose it on the article's talk page, at Talk:Mineral. A ecis Brievenbus 20:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Minerals is indeed a redirect to mineral, yes. But what would be the difference between what you have described in your sandbox and what is described in the article mineral? A  ecis Brievenbus 21:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I see that you have created a new article at Minerals. I have reverted it and restored the redirect to Mineral. We can't have two articles about essentially the same subject. If you think the article Mineral should be rewritten, you can propose this on the article's talk page Talk:Mineral. But if you want to write an article for people who don't know English very well, how about the Simple English Wikipedia, at simple:Mineral? A  ecis Brievenbus 21:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * But there are a lot of articles that haven't been written yet. Our Category:Minerals has 76 articles and 70 subcategories, simple:Category:Minerals has 38 articles and one subcategory. And how about simple:Wikipedia:Requested articles? A  ecis Brievenbus 21:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)