User:Ryan31105/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Category:C-Class Aquarium Fishes articles Talk:Butterfly splitfin

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose it because I find large aquariums to be rather interesting, and after clicking on the C-Class article page I saw this article about the Butterfly Splitfin fish. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was very well done and incredibly in-depth.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The Wikipedia article written about the Butterfly Splitflin provides a well-done, extensive, piece which speaks on the ecology of the Splitfin as well as human ownership of the fish. The content inside the article is both relevant and updated with modern information which provides the reader with a more through understanding of the article. Throughout the article the tone remains the same and, there is no evidence of their being opinionated writing. Their is many scientific references and sources so it is evident that the article provides the reader with accurate up-to-date knowledge. The piece is very well organized with it being split into separate sections for each part of the fish as well as the writing inside the paragraphs to be professional and has no obvious grammar or spelling problems. The images provided in the article are relevant to the article as the present photos of the fish in its natural habitat. It is clear that the article has been discussed by numerous users and has benefited from the combined effort of multiple individuals. In conclusion, this article about the Butterfly Splitfin fish is a professionally done article which features many unique sections about the Splitfin and, thrives on the complexity and depth of its writing. The article is very well developed and, communicates its ideas very well.