User:RyanMontero/Kyphosus cinerascens/Aizlynn.Gonzalez Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RyanMontero


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Kyphosus cinerascens

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) They did good in including a link for every sentence. I found it difficult to find a new link for each sentence.
 * 4) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * 5) " oval chunky profile with a short beak". This helps provide visual details.
 * 6) Thank you, I will add more very soon and yes most of my information is cited which I also like about it.
 * 7) Check the sources:
 * 8) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 9) Yes. there was just one not cited.
 * 10) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about?
 * 11) Yes
 * 12) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 13) Yes
 * 14) What is the quality of the sources?
 * 15) The quality is good.
 * 16) Thank you for the feedback!
 * 17) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 18) I would suggest adding more information.
 * 19) Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 20) It would allow your reader to learn more about your species.
 * 21) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 22) No. They need to add more information about their animal.
 * 23) I will be adding more information very soon so thank you for the feedback.
 * 24) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 25) Add more information.
 * 26) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * 27) I noticed it's okay to use the same source for multiple sentences.
 * 28) I will be adding more information especially multiple from the same link so thank you!