User:RyanMontero/Kyphosus cinerascens/TREVORtrbl Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RyanMontero


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:RyanMontero/Kyphosus cinerascens


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Kyphosus cinerascens

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) the article does well on providing references which is nice, and there is a lot of interesting facts not found in the existing.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?  I never knew there were yellow nenue, I hope to see one one day haha. 
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?yes,  it is very clear on its description 
 * 4) Thank you for the feedback, I was surprised with the yellow nenue also when it was my first time.
 * 5) Check the sources:
 * 6) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?  not all of them, but most of them do. 
 * 7) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about?  Yes 
 * 8) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number?  yes 
 * 9) What is the quality of the sources?  they are pretty good, either respected articles or ones that came from the leeward library. 
 * 10) Thank you, I would choose my choices carefully and not just anything that pulled up first on the search engine.
 * 11) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?  not much, but as long as we keep thinking of more facts to add to these articles we'll be good 
 * 12) Why would those changes be an improvement? because a lot of the information we find, its already on the article. So we have to dig deeper and hopefully find more facts to put down on the article.
 * 13) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Yes, and the more facts we find the better the article will be.
 * 14) Thank you, I will be adding more on my animal as soon as possible and start filling in the characteristics and more in depth habitats.
 * 15) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? maybe add more color to your paper, but other then that what you have now is great bud.
 * 16) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?  I think i could focused more on my description, and maybe my fish has new variants haha. good job on your post bro, take care! 
 * 17) Thank you, I will be adding a lot more very soon.