User:Ryan (Wiki Ed)/Felony disenfranchisement sources

Page purpose
This page is for participants in the Wiki Education "Write to Vote" Advanced Wikipedia course. Between February 28-March 27, we will be collaboratively working to apply Good Article criteria to the felony disenfranchisement in the United States article.

This page is for collecting and, optionally, annotating citations.

Feel free to create new sections or subsections, and reorganize as you see fit. For maximum usefulness, you may want to annotate sources as you add them, but that is by no means required. If you need access to a source, ask in Slack. If our group doesn't have access, you might want to ask at the Resource Exchange.

See also this other page for planning, coordination, and notes not directly tied to particular sources: User:Ryan (Wiki Ed)/Felony disenfranchisement planning.

Additional information about sourcing on Wikipedia

 * Identifying reliable sources - the fundamental policy about what Wikipedia considers a reliable source
 * Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources - some guidance on use of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources from Wikipedia's "no original research" policy
 * Identifying and using primary sources - additional guidance about primary sources
 * Citing sources - the process of citing sources in an article (you don't need to worry about formatting, etc. on this page, though)

Books and chapters
Hull, E., & Conyers, J. (2006). The History of Disenfranchisement Laws. In The Disenfranchisement of Ex-Felons (pp. 16-23). PHILADELPHIA: Temple University Press. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bt1q1.6 [re: background/history of disenfranchisement laws, 'civil death' as threat vs punitive act]

Journal articles
Grady, S. (2012). CIVIL DEATH IS DIFFERENT: AN EXAMINATION OF A POST-GRAHAM CHALLENGE TO FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 102(2), 441-470. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23415239 [re: Constitutional challenges, esp. 14th Amendment + 8th Amendment]

HINCHCLIFF, A. (2011). The "Other" Side of Richardson v. Ramirez: A Textual Challenge to Felon Disenfranchisement. The Yale Law Journal, 121(1), 194-236. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23079397 [re: Richardson v Ramirez, 14th Amendment basis for allowing states' autonomy in disenfranchisement decisions; points out that Constitutional basis for Ramirez leaves room for challenges based on 'other crimes' language in context and the lack of language to protect states from the loss of congressional representation due to disenfranchisement of residents]

Miscellaneous
Brennan Center for Justice (good visual aides) https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/criminal-disenfranchisement-laws-across-united-states

Can Felons Vote? It Depends on the State (NYT) https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/21/us/felony-voting-rights-law.html