User:Ryan Postlethwaite/sandboxc

Just to let everyone know, there's a new procedure for WP:RFCN new RFCN procedure, it basically means that it's going to be run like AfD, where each username has it's own page, and all that is listed on the main page is a list of templates directing to the specific discussion page, new archival templates are then used to properly close the discussion. this will hopefully allow the closing admin to better justify themselve, and give a firm policy reason for their action, hopefully this will stop many of the currect current bureaucratic actions there. I'd suggest having a quick look at the RFCN page just to check on the new way it work. For clarification, here are the new templates
 * RFCNdiscussion - this template is automatically added onto the specific discussion page when someone starts a new RFCN. Please be aware of the hidden comments.
 * Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names/USERNAME - this template is to be used to put the specific RFCN page onto the main page, replace USERNAME with the username that is being discussed. This should be removed by the closer on archiving thediscussion.
 * RFCNtop - this is the archive template which is put on the top of the relavent discussion page by the closer. The format should be result (optional statement on reasons for closing) ~ . Please note, that only admins who have not commented on the username should close the discussion.
 * RFCNbottom - this is the archive template which is put on the bottom of the relavent discussion page by the closer. The format should be.
 * I've also changed the main template for the page to instruct on thenew system; RFCUsername. Please check the diffs to see whats changed.
 * . This template can be used on the blocked users talk page to explain the block and give a direct link to the discussion. USERNAME should be replaced with the name of the blocked user.

If there's any problems you can see with it, let me know, or leave a note on WT:RFCN Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 07:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)