User:Ryanshie/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
G0v

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am Taiwanese, and I wanted to learn about civic technologies used between the government and the people in Taiwan.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Lead: Lead is concise, gives a general idea of what the article will be about, and also introduces the main subjects the article will cover.
 * Content: The content is relevant, non-biased. Info is up to date, and is not missing any content.
 * Tone and balance: A neutral view, does not include any bias or opinions in the article.
 * Sources: There are multiple sources, and a wide variety of inputs. However, there are some links that do not work, and there is one link that google found unsafe.
 * Organization and writing quality: Article was easy to read, it delivered information well without being overly complicated. The article is well organized and does not contain any spelling or grammatical errors.
 * Images and media: No images or media in the article, could potentially be improved by adding an image of the logo of the movement.
 * Talk page: There are no other conversations. However, this article was once nominated for deletion, but that was rejected. It is part of Wikiproject Taiwan, and also Wikiproject Internet culture.
 * Overall:
 * Status: Article is well written and delivers information in a concise, unbiased way. The article is well organized, following the timeline of the events that happened on this subject.
 * Strengths: Organized well, and it also expands into other topics related to the article towards the end for people looking for more information.
 * Improvement: I feel that some images or media could be used to improve the quality of the article, and give readers a better idea of what the article is about at first glance.
 * Completeness: I would say that it is well written, but it could still use some additions to the article such as images and more information about the other branches of the g0v project.

This article begins with a clear and easy to understand lead, which has a concise introduction that gives the reader a general idea of what the article is about. It also introduces subjects within the article that the page will cover. The reader is provided with clear and non-biased information about the g0v movement and includes up to date information. The article is easy to read and comprehend while also providing a lot of information on the g0v project and maintaining a neutral view on the subject. The citations of the article mostly work, however, there are a few links that no longer exist. At first glance, it is hard to tell what the article is exactly about. I feel that adding an image of the logo of the project or some sort of media relating to the g0v project would improve the article. Overall, while this article could use some improvement, it has a solid and unbiased view on the content covered, and relays information to the reader well.