User:Ryanyomomma

simple user. Thats all I am. Hoorah. Oh, seeing that wikipedia is supposed to be open source (which it is as far as format is concerned), and controlled by the populous as opposed to machines or one sided standard, I truly believe that its not true. Some editors truly are machines.. They have nothing better to do with their time than edit pages. Even editing stuff that ends up wrong and the rationale for it is "wikipedia guidelines". Guidelines are fine. It keeps general control on what gets placed on wikipedia and keeps order. I read some of the guidlines in the past and the human factor that I saw was the fact that things maybe changed through case by case basis'. Thats fine and dandy....BUT, what good is that stipulation if all the hard liner authors (hardcore editors) don't acknowledge that 98.89% of the time? You find something thats wrong. You know its wrong and you have enough content and the will of the people to correct that change...but some other user comes and reverts that content to its wrong state citing that we go by "this" and its protected under wiki guidelines only. YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE A MACHINE.

Let it be known, if you are a machine. You better run. I am John Connor. I am the resistance...and I will fight the machines....and win.