User:Ryanzhu21/Fanny Hesse/CBrown405 Peer Review

Lead:4

Content:5

Tone/balance:5

Sources/references:5

Organization:5

A good start and well put together. I am doing somewhat of the same idea of finding information to be added to the article as well that was not there previously. Your organization and sources look great.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)