User:Ryanzisk26/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Andean Mountain Cat
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has 17 references and some information on conservation, listing the IUCN status and several policies around the world that have been enacted to help. With a little more research, I can tell if it's worthwhile or not to edit this article, but it seems like a valid candidate.
 * This article has 17 references and some information on conservation, listing the IUCN status and several policies around the world that have been enacted to help. With a little more research, I can tell if it's worthwhile or not to edit this article, but it seems like a valid candidate.



Option 2

 * Article title: Bleeding Toad
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article only has 7 references and has no information on conservation. There is a small paragraph about the threats to the species, but it doesn't go into depth about how to help the species, instead just talking about what's wrong with it. This is a good article because it has some information, but not a lot so I can easily add to it.
 * This article only has 7 references and has no information on conservation. There is a small paragraph about the threats to the species, but it doesn't go into depth about how to help the species, instead just talking about what's wrong with it. This is a good article because it has some information, but not a lot so I can easily add to it.

Option 3

 * Article title: Philippine Sailfin Lizard
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has more substance than the others, but it still only has 15 references. There is one paragraph on conservation, but with enough research I'm confident that I can add to it and make it more well-rounded overall.
 * This article has more substance than the others, but it still only has 15 references. There is one paragraph on conservation, but with enough research I'm confident that I can add to it and make it more well-rounded overall.



Option 4

 * Article title: Sao Tombe Ibis
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article only has one reference and very little information. The information that it does have isn't cited well, which I can change as well. I think this is a good article because I'm basically starting from scratch.
 * This article only has one reference and very little information. The information that it does have isn't cited well, which I can change as well. I think this is a good article because I'm basically starting from scratch.



Option 5

 * Article title: Przewalski's Horse
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article probably isn't best to evaluate because there's a lot of good information about conservation and the life of the species. Although it does appear interesting, there's already 69 other references, so it would be difficult to add a substantial amount of information.
 * This article probably isn't best to evaluate because there's a lot of good information about conservation and the life of the species. Although it does appear interesting, there's already 69 other references, so it would be difficult to add a substantial amount of information.