User:Ryanzisk26/São Tomé ibis/Menacing djungelskog Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

Ryanzisk26

Guiding questions:
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ryanzisk26/São Tomé ibis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * São Tomé ibis
 * São Tomé ibis

The author has not yet edited the lead of the article, although they have it in their sandbox indicating that they're planning to. The Lead of the current article has a clear and concise introductory sentence that supports the topic. However, the Lead could be edited to include a short description of the article's sections. The content added so far is relevant to the main topic of the article. The author of the article has revised the population and threats section. They have updated the population number of the species so that it is accurate and reflects current data. They have improved the overall tone and structure of the section, while still maintaining a neutral tone. The sources are reputable and are peer-reviewed articles or come from the IUCN. Sources are properly cited and seem to be current. The authors of the articles are well-respected in their fields and are reputable. More sections could be added to the article to better organize information. I would say that by the looks of the one edited section so far, the author has improved the article and will continue to do so, section by section.