User:Rytpat

WHY I WRITE

At the window seat of a public transport; wind gushing through the middle window, caressing my face fiercely and forcing my eyes to close. I had already missed sunyani whiles I fervently yearned to reach cape coast; home sweet home. After a fierce battle with the wind I repudiated to fall asleep because the magnificent views of over hundred years old trees and slightly mountainous green hills made it quasi-impossible to acquiesce to sleeping; I feasted my eyes and adored nature till I gave up and finally retired to the peaceful place in my mind with my eyes closed. Transcending from that state of conundrum to a place of peace, I asked myself a question which was propelled by an essay I was reading whilst travelling by George Orwell. WHY I WRITE? –I gathered was basically addressing topics that have dwelled in vagueness for ages and give it a befitting guise through apparent luminosity so that the less privilege in cognition can peruse and understand with clarity in its undeniable form. I try to give a single colour to information that seem iridescent to the untrained mind, or people who have not mastered the art of processing information. I was suddenly stricken that I have been endowed with a grotesque complacency that given enough time, I could turn a homosexual to at least, process emotion like the lesser animals (cats, cows and goats) through confab. I will never write about anything just to be hostile but rather would love to explain why I am belligerent towards that particular topic. We animals, -human beings inclusive get purified emotions of love, lust etc when we are invigorated by the opposite sex, just like dogs and hippos, therefore no one can convince me that gays are fully human or in the least higher animals than cats, dogs etc. Even the lesser animals have feeling for the opposite sex, if a human decides to copulate with a pig on the regular, we would inevitably be inclined to place him under the umbrella of emotional dissonance or mentally unstable. Why? Because humans are not to engage in sexual intercourses with animals, plain and simple, I can’t see how discerning people with sagacity can embrace sexual intercourses between the same sex as less opprobrious; the fundamental distinctions of the human species disallow homosexuality; how come animals that wants to be seen within the circles of humans execute actions that can only be interpreted as non human. Naturally, humans develop their character watching adults or by inheritance, so if we emulate our predecessors, all Homo sapiens should cultivate the emotion of love only for the opposite sex, therefore the first person who had feelings to copulate with the same sex obviously had a mental disorder for it cannot be traced through the existence of men. Living things are to copulate with the opposite sex and that’s final, it manifest even in plants. I have always wondered where gays would be in Plato’s republic- obviously they can’t be with the humans. My guess is cows would be important than homosexuals because they would be useful by producing milk and giving birth to other calves. If all animals copulate with the opposite sex, then its tractable to decipher this discombobulating issue as to whether they should be treated as humans. At the same time, I disincline that the matter be address through harangue. As it were, I am not against gay rights, inasmuch as dogs and cats have the right to live and even get married, gays should also be given their rights as gays to do whatever they wish but should relinquish the steady efforts of trying to promulgate and legalise the practices of homosexuality. My argument is that. Inasmuch as they should be given rights; rights accorded them are their rights as gays but not rights as human beings because in principle they are not fully human. Is the homosexual activist trying to tell as that even dogs can process emotions better than gays.-because if the lesser animals copulate with only the opposite sex and in rare cases hermaphrodites-with same. That makes the lesser animals far wiser than the average homosexual, gays are knowledgeable, some are even geniuses but not a single gay is wise. Philosophy teaches us that wisdom comes with morals, moderation and virtues. To make it superfluously lucid, no homosexual can be wise because a man that can be identified with proper codes of morality can’t have feeling for the same sex. If we try to juxtapose gays and real humans, I am afraid it is going to be inimical because the discrepancies will be unbearably onerous to transcend from the present state of conundrum into congruousness. Habitually; I still say it is an egregious collocation and there is no way we can be concatenate, not by emotions, not by species.

By: Robert Brodie-Mends. cape coast, ghana