User:Rzheng37/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Social media marketing

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

Article begins with a straightforward definition of what social media marketing is and describes its standing in modern day society and how its used. To add on the article does not describe or mention the different body paragraphs. Besides that everything else briefly summarizes the remaining of the article.

Content:

Most of the content are relevant and theres a equal share of information throughout all the body paragraphs, however some of the content needs to be reverified as it is old. Besides that it is very organized, every section is in depth and explains everything with detail and examples. The body paragraphs are sectioned in a way that presents reasonings from all perspectives of the topic.

'''

Tone and Balance:'''

The article is completely neutral it covers views from all aspect, the tone is logical. All the reasonings are backed by research articles and cited. There are very minimal opinion in this article, it also explains the different approaches to social media marketing rather than just the different methods of it. All the points made are using supporting documentations and not opinions, there are also no bias.

Sources and References:

The sources are accurate and precise, however some of the citations are old and needs to be update. Furthermore the citations can be from better and more trustable sources rather than 3rd party sources. But besides from this all of the citations matches whats on the citation page.

Organization and writing quality:

The article is well written, beginning with the introduction which briefly goes over all the topics. Following that is the main body paragraphs and the different aspects. Finally its the stratagies involved with the topics. Overall the organization and the writing quality of the article is very high and well supported.

Images and Media:

There were very minimal images, and they were low quality images. The images show a very old iPhone which does not represent what the article was talking about. There are also very little pictures throughout the entire article. Overall this article can have more relevant pictures.

Talk Page description:

There are no talk page descriptions for this article, however I can foresee many different topics that can be discussed about this article as it is closely related to modern day marketing.

Overall impression:

Overall I think this is a well written article that can have tweaks here and there. The main thing I had a concern about would be the pictures used throughout the article. Although the article is very well written the pictures do not accuretly follow up to date or represent the topics. Besides from that everything looks great!