User:Rzheng37/Social media marketing/GGHTOO Peer Review

General info
Rzheng37
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Editing User:Rzheng37/Social media marketing - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Social media marketing - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has not been updated. The content that has been added is relevant to the topic and are up to date. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics. As for the tone and balance, the content added was mainly neutral without many claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. The content added does not really attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another as well. The new content is not backed up by reliable secondary sources of information. However, the content does accurately reflect what the cited sources say, and the sources are also thorough and current. It is unclear if the sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors, but it appears to not be the case and they do not include historically marginalized individuals. The links for the cited sources work, but there are better sources that are available for Rzheng37 to use. For the organization aspect, the content added overall is well-written and well-organized and has only a bit of grammatical and spelling errors. Overall, the content added improved the overall quality of the article, which is one of its strengths as well as making the two sections of the article more informative. However, one thing that could be done to improve the content is by using better secondary sources, such as peer-reviewed articles. They can try using google scholar to find better sources that are more likely to be peer-reviewed.