User:S.F.ARE3030/Greek baths/Abbymetzger Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

S.F.ARE3030


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:S.F.ARE3030/Greek baths - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Greek baths - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Greek baths - Wikipedia
 * Greek baths - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
This writer added a lot of valuable information about Greek baths. Specifically, they added more content about social life and culture, water management and technology, floor plan and features, and some for the lead of the article. They seemed to have done good research on these subjects and how they wrote out the sections has a nice flow. They are short and sweet to get to the facts and not too informal. Their sources are current and neutral. I wasn't pulled to a certain side, and it was easy to read. They also did a good job with noting what revisions they made in the revision history part of the article. The lead they added too includes information for an introductory and gives me a good sense as to what I will read for the rest of the article. I do think this writer added a lot of content that improves the article. They added a lot more information about the baths and added more sections on what the baths look like. It's nice to have the history and technology part but adding floor plans and information about social life was a smart move and gave me a visual. For the article as a whole, it follows the same layout, and nothing is out of the ordinary. They did a good job citing their sources and the pictures they added fit well into the subject as well. The article also gives a suggestion to check out the Greek Baths of Gela as well. There are some minor grammatical errors like not combing bathtub as one word, but other than that it is not bad.