User:S.glo1/sandbox

Article evaluation
- The topic that I picked was Science and Technology Studies which develops into a small section named Social Studies of Finance. This smaller section goes into depth about what is gained scientifically and based on technology uses as well. It does develop a lot of history on the part of how financing became an actual thing that people studied. Social structures and culture characteristics was an open navigation for financial markets. One thing that was very distracting while reading was that there was not a lot of external links and references that I thought this field in particular this section would have had. In terms of out of date work in this wikipedia assignment this section of Science and Technology Studies that branched out into finance did open up to a reference of 1984, I do not consider this out of date but then I do. I do because it does include a proper reference as well as good and important information but, then again I don't because not every source such as secondhand can be properly trusted during this time. I trust more primary sources. I believe that more pages should have been in this research to explain more about the topic rather than one thick amount of wording. More information definitely needs to be improved. There should be more subtitles. There should be more things explained by other references; in their own words.

Sources:

Neutral presentation
-This article looks very neutral only because it is presented with self strict general descriptions and needs to work more on different perspectives. As the description was mentioned only pieces of information is sorted out and tied together not a lot that many viewers can actually dig into. On the top of the page, it does mention that this specific page and category needs more information and help. The links are reliable but, again we need more links to show more information on this topic. There is not much claiming in the article right now but, to support the little description in the article the links do support the main page. There is biased written into the external links because some people ought to create a strong claim for finance is the way it is. Some people believe that bias was written because of how older times and their mistakes often affected the current generation now to have finance the way that it is. The talk page is still in the transition of improvements and will later be rated along with fixed issues once this article is steadily increasing with other users besides me.

Next article revision according to my class of psychology would be Developmental Stage Theories.

Developmental Stage Theories

I plan to cooperate certain things I learned in psychology to be added in this given article. I can show why certain ages act the way that they do. It should include different stages by different psychologists to prove this person's page and point. This article is very important due to its references and how everything is presented. It shows a wide amount of neutrality within the history that has occurred over a period of time. The paragraphs or descriptions are very detailed and shows me where different links are and how it connects to the points that are shown to developmental stage theories. This article defines three important things that I will discuss amongst my citations. Jean Piaget, child psychology, and the actual page on developmental stage theories will be briefly explained. Jean Piaget was a psychologist in the field of of child developmental. Piaget's theory of cognitive development was his speciality. He advanced more on what these types of children on their ages were developing based on their knowledge. He used their knowledge to experiment in how long it took for average children to learn what they needed to learn. His ideas were mostly spread during the 1960s. An example of his theory upon education on children were; the environmental surroundings that they were associated in. If they were safe then they were less worried about their safety as well as vice versa. For the teachers there were more opportunities and different attitudes they needed to portray to keep children in tact of what they needed to focus on. Child development was another key point. This proved different points from birth until different ages while growing up. It recommended ways of how birth can actually have an impact on their future life. Genetics are heavily focused in this field but will not only be the reason for why children are the way that they are. Stages are often broken up by categories and ages. There is many sections upon this action which proves many unbiased as well as biased relations. The claim transitions into successful statements in order to tie into order things does show a successful structure and what the writer is talking about in its source. The details of the stages in particular are very specific in the way it is presented making this a reliable source as well. For this article Developmental stage theories, it divides a specific point to different psychologists interacting their predictions upon these developments and what they may think what is right or wrong. It gives the overall point to why this description exists. Behavior acts as a characteristic in these changes that is why it is highly emphasized into different sections within the stages. They must need to learn how to control their actions. Sometimes their behaviors may be grown out of or kept in tact unless they fix the way they feel. The importance of emotions override internal importance because emotions are highly recommended in fixing according to an elder or your parents. Parents are the key to everything. They must seek out your weaknesses or else what is the point of getting help?

Sources:

Our person for our group is named Hanna Fenichel. This link: basically defines my information because the page itself on Hana Fenichel does not have a lot of information. I am now going to make some changes to the page to describe her purpose/work and the conclusion of her efforts within two paragraphs.

Purpose/Work- Hana Fenichel has went through many things in her life. Mainly she invested her time in politics and made sure that she understood what was actually happening between the opposing side and for the side that she thought that was mostly benefiting from due tp what was being argued about. One of her works was known as The Concept of Representation (1967) which has risen from the comprised efforts between philosophy and different political theories known during her lifetime. She also includes other philosophers to set aside their points in her arguments about what she preaches politically. In this source, it states "re-presentation, a making present again" is under the circumstances of what representation really means by Hana Fenichel. She is basically arguing how representation is a phrase that always will be spoken about but, always be shown throughout time. Time again even if there are certain changes amongst political standards it will always be evaluated and looked over by others. The form of representation will have no escape because there is always a rise of tension and power amongst how solutions should be solved. She believed that people had the right to their own decisions as well as acting independently instead of acting with a crowd that can make things worse according to different circumstances. Her work as stated did define her as an absolute theorist and thinker. She knew the mind of others and how to perceive them as well as think things through accordingly.

One political philosopher she did interestingly paid attention to was Ludwig Wittgenstein. He created a section of his work labeled "forms of life". This involved the use of human behavior. She argued about this in the sense of justice and taking different actions but, according to the political theory others wanted for for this. They wanted something different that had to deal with the actions in which change was actually taking a turn and what was being promoted in an human's everyday life. This brand about many tensions and this is basically why all of her works have true meaning to her arguments. She wants to justify what it means not the actions taken forth because without meaning then there is no representation. Without representation then there is no solution. I love this piece by her of what she is very famous for because it points out how bold she is. It points out that she is consistent to make a change happen but, not for no reason for a substantial meaning. She justifies that life takes many courses but, it takes an argument to see what points are really true and what points needs to take a specific turn and tour.

(this is a link to an image showing an educational foundation inspired by the works of Hana Fenichel in the 21st century).

(this is a link that represents a book written by Hana Fenichel that reflects the representation of government and how over time it has evolved for the better and worse)