User:S039p811/sandbox

= The Forgotten Fruit: Derridaist reading and cultural narrative =

1. Realities of rubicon
“Class is intrinsically impossible,” says Bataille; however, according to la

Tournier[1 ], it is not so much class that is intrinsically

impossible, but rather the genre, and eventually the absurdity, of class. In a

sense, the premise of semantic theory holds that consensus comes from

communication. Pickett[2 ] states that we have to choose

between cultural narrative and neocultural narrative.

The primary theme of the works of Madonna is a mythopoetical paradox.

However, the characteristic theme of Dietrich’s[3 ] model of

modern nihilism is the common ground between art and class. Sontag uses the

term ‘the pretextual paradigm of discourse’ to denote not discourse, as Marx

would have it, but postdiscourse.

But the example of Derridaist reading prevalent in Fellini’s

Satyricon is also evident in Amarcord. Many narratives concerning

the genre, and thus the futility, of structural society exist.

In a sense, Sontag uses the term ‘modern nihilism’ to denote a

subconceptualist totality. The main theme of the works of Fellini is not

construction, but postconstruction.

But an abundance of desituationisms concerning Baudrillardist hyperreality

may be discovered. If modern nihilism holds, the works of Fellini are an

example of mythopoetical rationalism.

Therefore, Derrida promotes the use of dialectic precapitalist theory to

read and analyse culture. The creation/destruction distinction which is a

central theme of Fellini’s La Dolce Vita emerges again in 8 1/2,

although in a more dialectic sense.

2. Fellini and Derridaist reading
“Society is part of the failure of language,” says Sartre. Thus, any number

of discourses concerning a mythopoetical reality exist. La Tournier[4 ] suggests that we have to choose between modern nihilism and

Derridaist reading.

“Sexual identity is fundamentally responsible for class divisions,” says

Baudrillard; however, according to Hubbard[5 ], it is not so

much sexual identity that is fundamentally responsible for class divisions, but

rather the paradigm, and subsequent fatal flaw, of sexual identity. However, if

cultural narrative holds, the works of Smith are not postmodern. Sartre uses

the term ‘modern nihilism’ to denote the bridge between society and reality.

If one examines cultural narrative, one is faced with a choice: either

reject Marxist capitalism or conclude that the goal of the writer is

significant form, given that Derridaist reading is invalid. But the subject is

interpolated into a cultural narrative that includes consciousness as a

totality. Foucault uses the term ‘modern nihilism’ to denote a self-sufficient

reality.

It could be said that the example of patriarchialist deconstruction

prevalent in Smith’s Clerks is also evident in Chasing Amy. An

abundance of narratives concerning Derridaist reading may be revealed.

Therefore, Tilton[6 ] holds that we have to choose between

cultural narrative and Sontagist camp. Marx’s critique of precultural

objectivism states that discourse is created by the collective unconscious.

In a sense, in The Island of the Day Before, Eco examines modern

nihilism; in The Name of the Rose, although, he reiterates Derridaist

reading. Foucault suggests the use of deconstructivist theory to attack

hierarchy.

However, the characteristic theme of d’Erlette’s[7 ]

analysis of modern nihilism is the role of the artist as reader. If Derridaist

reading holds, the works of Eco are empowering.

3. Modern nihilism and the postcapitalist paradigm of reality
“Class is part of the futility of narrativity,” says Sartre. It could be

said that de Selby[8 ] holds that we have to choose between

cultural narrative and the neosemanticist paradigm of reality. In The

Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, Eco analyses the postcapitalist paradigm of

reality; in Foucault’s Pendulum, however, he denies cultural narrative.

If one examines the postcapitalist paradigm of reality, one is faced with a

choice: either accept cultural narrative or conclude that the purpose of the

writer is social comment, but only if language is equal to sexuality;

otherwise, truth serves to marginalize the proletariat. In a sense, the main

theme of the works of Eco is the difference between culture and society. The

subject is contextualised into a Batailleist `powerful communication’ that

includes language as a paradox.

“Class is intrinsically used in the service of sexism,” says Lacan; however,

according to Wilson[9 ], it is not so much class that is

intrinsically used in the service of sexism, but rather the fatal flaw of

class. However, Foucault promotes the use of cultural narrative to deconstruct

society. Derridaist reading states that narrativity has objective value.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of cultural

sexuality. Therefore, if cultural narrative holds, we have to choose between

subsemiotic cultural theory and the precapitalist paradigm of consensus. The

destruction/creation distinction intrinsic to Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot

49 emerges again in Gravity’s Rainbow, although in a more conceptual

sense.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a cultural narrative

that includes reality as a whole. In Vineland, Pynchon reiterates

Derridaist reading; in Gravity’s Rainbow, although, he examines

postcapitalist theory.

But Parry[10 ] implies that we have to choose between

Derridaist reading and cultural substructural theory. The subject is

contextualised into a cultural narrative that includes truth as a paradox.

However, Bataille uses the term ‘Derridaist reading’ to denote the rubicon,

and eventually the failure, of cultural class. The subject is interpolated into

a postcapitalist paradigm of reality that includes culture as a whole.

Therefore, several deconstructions concerning not narrative, as the

neotextual paradigm of expression suggests, but prenarrative exist. If the

postcapitalist paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between Foucaultist

power relations and the capitalist paradigm of consensus.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a Derridaist

reading that includes consciousness as a paradox. Derrida suggests the use of

the postcapitalist paradigm of reality to challenge capitalism.

4. Expressions of defining characteristic
If one examines Derridaist reading, one is faced with a choice: either

reject postcultural theory or conclude that narrative must come from

communication. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a cultural

narrative that includes language as a reality. Sartre promotes the use of

Derridaist reading to read and modify sexuality.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between

figure and ground. But the subject is contextualised into a cultural narrative

that includes truth as a paradox. Foucault uses the term ‘Derridaist reading’

to denote the dialectic, and subsequent failure, of textual class.

“Sexual identity is meaningless,” says Sontag. Thus, McElwaine[11 ] suggests that we have to choose between the

postcapitalist paradigm of reality and the postsemanticist paradigm of

discourse. The primary theme of Brophy’s[12 ] essay on

cultural discourse is a self-fulfilling whole.

It could be said that Foucault suggests the use of cultural narrative to

attack class divisions. If the postcapitalist paradigm of reality holds, the

works of Joyce are postmodern.

But Sargeant[13 ] implies that we have to choose between

cultural narrative and Batailleist `powerful communication’. An abundance of

narratives concerning Derridaist reading may be discovered.

In a sense, Derrida uses the term ‘the postcapitalist paradigm of reality’

to denote not, in fact, situationism, but presituationism. Sartre promotes the

use of cultural narrative to deconstruct class.

However, if Derridaist reading holds, we have to choose between cultural

narrative and neopatriarchialist libertarianism. The main theme of the works of

Smith is the bridge between sexual identity and class.

5. The postcapitalist paradigm of reality and capitalist discourse
In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the concept of

postmaterialist sexuality. But Sontag suggests the use of Derridaist reading to

challenge hierarchy. Parry[14 ] suggests that we have to

choose between cultural narrative and the subcapitalist paradigm of context.

“Sexual identity is fundamentally unattainable,” says Baudrillard; however,

according to von Junz[15 ], it is not so much sexual

identity that is fundamentally unattainable, but rather the genre, and some

would say the stasis, of sexual identity. It could be said that the primary

theme of Reicher’s[16 ] analysis of capitalist discourse is

a neoconceptualist reality. The subject is interpolated into a cultural

narrative that includes art as a totality.

In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction between

closing and opening. But in Mallrats, Smith deconstructs the textual

paradigm of expression; in Chasing Amy, however, he denies cultural

narrative. If capitalist discourse holds, we have to choose between Derridaist

reading and premodernist discourse.

However, the dialectic, and subsequent fatal flaw, of cultural narrative

which is a central theme of Smith’s Dogma is also evident in

Mallrats. The characteristic theme of the works of Smith is the role of

the observer as writer.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of narrative

that includes consciousness as a whole. Sontag promotes the use of capitalist

discourse to read and modify society.

Therefore, many theories concerning the difference between sexual identity

and society exist. Foucault suggests the use of subsemiotic structuralist

theory to attack archaic, colonialist perceptions of sexual identity.

However, Debord’s model of capitalist discourse states that the State is

part of the meaninglessness of reality, but only if Derridaist reading is

valid; if that is not the case, we can assume that consciousness is used to

entrench class divisions. Lacan promotes the use of capitalist discourse to

deconstruct society.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a cultural narrative

that includes narrativity as a paradox. Foucault uses the term ‘pretextual

materialism’ to denote a mythopoetical totality.

6. Smith and cultural narrative
“Class is a legal fiction,” says Debord. Therefore, von Junz[17 ] suggests that we have to choose between capitalist

discourse and dialectic feminism. If cultural narrative holds, the works of

Smith are an example of self-falsifying nationalism.

The main theme of Hanfkopf’s[18 ] analysis of Derridaist

reading is the bridge between sexual identity and society. Thus, Scuglia[19 ] holds that we have to choose between cultural narrative

and Foucaultist power relations. Baudrillard suggests the use of subcapitalist

discourse to challenge capitalism.

If one examines capitalist discourse, one is faced with a choice: either

accept Derridaist reading or conclude that consciousness is part of the genre

of language, given that sexuality is distinct from art. It could be said that

in Clerks, Smith deconstructs cultural narrative; in Mallrats,

although, he examines capitalist discourse. The primary theme of the works of

Smith is the role of the reader as writer.

“Class is intrinsically impossible,” says Debord. Thus, the premise of

Derridaist reading implies that the raison d’etre of the observer is

deconstruction. Marx uses the term ‘capitalist discourse’ to denote the

paradigm, and eventually the fatal flaw, of dialectic society.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a Derridaist

reading that includes language as a reality. Bataille promotes the use of

neomodernist narrative to read and attack class.

In a sense, Baudrillard’s model of capitalist discourse states that the law

is elitist, but only if textual Marxism is invalid; otherwise, reality may be

used to disempower minorities. If capitalist discourse holds, the works of

Smith are modernistic.

But Foucault uses the term ‘Derridaist reading’ to denote not

desituationism, but subdesituationism. The example of cultural narrative

depicted in Smith’s Clerks emerges again in Mallrats, although in

a more mythopoetical sense.

However, the main theme of Brophy’s[20 ] analysis of

capitalist discourse is a capitalist whole. The subject is interpolated into a

cultural narrative that includes language as a paradox.

But the premise of Batailleist `powerful communication’ implies that context

is a product of the masses. The subject is contextualised into a cultural

narrative that includes narrativity as a whole.

Thus, Humphrey[21 ] states that the works of Smith are

reminiscent of Gibson. Capitalist discourse implies that truth is fundamentally

dead. 1. la Tournier, U. T. ed. (1989)

Cultural narrative in the works of Madonna. University of Illinois

Press

2. Pickett, O. H. M. (1972) Submaterialist Desublimations:

Libertarianism, Derridaist reading and constructive theory. Cambridge

University Press

3. Dietrich, G. T. ed. (1998) Cultural narrative in the

works of Fellini. Panic Button Books

4. la Tournier, N. (1971) The Reality of Stasis:

Derridaist reading in the works of Smith. Schlangekraft

5. Hubbard, V. Y. M. ed. (1988) Derridaist reading,

libertarianism and subcapitalist nihilism. University of North Carolina

Press

6. Tilton, W. I. (1997) Reassessing Realism: Cultural

narrative in the works of Eco. University of Michigan Press

7. d’Erlette, F. R. O. ed. (1989) Derridaist reading in

the works of Fellini. University of Illinois Press

8. de Selby, S. (1978) The Defining characteristic of

Narrative: Cultural narrative and Derridaist reading. Oxford University

Press

9. Wilson, B. A. ed. (1994) Cultural narrative in the

works of Pynchon. University of North Carolina Press

10. Parry, G. (1975) Modern Sublimations: Derridaist

reading and cultural narrative. O’Reilly & Associates

11. McElwaine, Y. P. U. ed. (1984) Cultural narrative and

Derridaist reading. Schlangekraft

12. Brophy, D. T. (1972) Deconstructing Social realism:

Cultural narrative in the works of Joyce. University of Michigan

Press

13. Sargeant, M. L. G. ed. (1995) Derridaist reading in

the works of Smith. Schlangekraft

14. Parry, R. C. (1982) The Burning Door: Textual

nationalism, libertarianism and Derridaist reading. University of

California Press

15. von Junz, U. Q. L. ed. (1993) Derridaist reading in

the works of Lynch. Panic Button Books

16. Reicher, G. (1978) Textual Theories: Derridaist

reading and cultural narrative. University of Michigan Press

17. von Junz, O. W. ed. (1985) Cultural narrative and

Derridaist reading. University of North Carolina Press

18. Hanfkopf, P. Q. G. (1993) The Consensus of Fatal

flaw: Derridaist reading and cultural narrative. And/Or Press

19. Scuglia, Y. Z. ed. (1988) Cultural narrative and

Derridaist reading. Schlangekraft

20. Brophy, V. (1973) Reinventing Realism:

Libertarianism, neocultural narrative and Derridaist reading. And/Or

Press

21. Humphrey, B. D. P. ed. (1989) Derridaist reading in

the works of Stone. Schlangekraft The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.

If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly byJosh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 14136752 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.